"IF" you were going to take these shots
07-25-2008, 09:06 AM
#1
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
"IF" you were going to take these shots
Premise is compound bow.....pins set at 20, 30, 40 and 50 yds.
Shot #1 - 2 yds at a broadside target.
Shot #2 - ZERO yds at a deer, broadside, directly beneath you.
Which pin do you use (to hit your "spot")for each shot? Remember topick asmall "spot"
**Edit - If you choose to use (to aim with)the arrow, your riser, a curling iron welded to your riser, a boar's hair dangling from your site OR any other method.....and it works, for YOU.....you are fully aware of your own abilities.....you are NOT a dumbass.....and you are quite possibly the greatest thing since sliced bread.
Shot #1 - 2 yds at a broadside target.
Shot #2 - ZERO yds at a deer, broadside, directly beneath you.
Which pin do you use (to hit your "spot")for each shot? Remember topick asmall "spot"
**Edit - If you choose to use (to aim with)the arrow, your riser, a curling iron welded to your riser, a boar's hair dangling from your site OR any other method.....and it works, for YOU.....you are fully aware of your own abilities.....you are NOT a dumbass.....and you are quite possibly the greatest thing since sliced bread.
07-25-2008, 09:13 AM
#3
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 3,612
RE: "IF" you were going to take these shots
Shot #1 - 2 yds at a broadside target.
I use my 20 yard pin, aim at the lower 1/3rd of the deer, or more specifically, the lower 3 inches. The arrow will rise and strike sweet.
Shot #2 - ZERO yds at a deer, broadside, directly beneath you.
I do not shoot.
I use my 20 yard pin, aim at the lower 1/3rd of the deer, or more specifically, the lower 3 inches. The arrow will rise and strike sweet.
Shot #2 - ZERO yds at a deer, broadside, directly beneath you.
I do not shoot.
07-25-2008, 09:17 AM
#4
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
RE: "IF" you were going to take these shots
I said "IF" in the thread header, VA.....for shot No. 2.
And your answer to No. 1 is why I made this thread.....and why I commented on your post in the other thread.
That logic is flawed. No offense intended.....it just is.
And your answer to No. 1 is why I made this thread.....and why I commented on your post in the other thread.
That logic is flawed. No offense intended.....it just is.
07-25-2008, 09:18 AM
#5
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,363
RE: "IF" you were going to take these shots
ORIGINAL: bigbulls
Kind of depends onhow far the peep is from the nocking pointbut either 40 or 50.
Kind of depends onhow far the peep is from the nocking pointbut either 40 or 50.
07-25-2008, 09:20 AM
#7
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 3,612
RE: "IF" you were going to take these shots
The logic may be flawed, but my results speak for themselves. I aim just like I described in my post above and the results have been well placed shots with dead deer.
07-25-2008, 09:22 AM
#8
RE: "IF" you were going to take these shots
Gmmat im sure virginia isn't feeding you false information for nothing im sure he has used this himself and had success. It may be wrong in your books but hey it works for him im sure.
07-25-2008, 09:24 AM
#10
Dominant Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 21,043
RE: "IF" you were going to take these shots
The logic may be flawed, but my results speak for themselves. I aim just like I described in my post above and the results have been well placed shots with dead deer.
Please don't take this personally (trust me)....as it was intended to teach a lesson (to maybe others who don't understand the 'physics' of this)I learned just about a year ago (shooting targets). I am SURE your results speak for themselves. Never questioned that, at all.
That out of the way......the logic is flawed.
Gmmat im sure virginia isn't feeding you false information for nothing im sure he has used this himself and had success.