How do you define a "top end".....
#11
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Where my house is and I do most of my hunting I would define top end as the top 1% of the bucks taken in my area. I can't say what % of mature bucks taken because there really aren't enough mature bucks taken every year to know. Most people around here are "buck" hunters. Nothing wrong with that, but it makes it difficult to compare.
I live in Preble county Buckeye, and I am sure you are aware that we are one of, if not the lowest producer of "trophy" bucks in the state. However, if a buck here could live to see 4.5 or 5.5 I guarentee that he would be an absolute brute. It is just so seldom that they are able to live that long. I would say in 22 years of hunting here, and my father more like 30, we have seen a total of 10-12 bucks that were in that age group.
I live in Preble county Buckeye, and I am sure you are aware that we are one of, if not the lowest producer of "trophy" bucks in the state. However, if a buck here could live to see 4.5 or 5.5 I guarentee that he would be an absolute brute. It is just so seldom that they are able to live that long. I would say in 22 years of hunting here, and my father more like 30, we have seen a total of 10-12 bucks that were in that age group.
#13
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Lets see...I initally was going to say 10% but that really isnt quite right...that is 10 out of every 100 bucks, which is really what I estimate to be about the proportion of 3.5+ year old bucks to total bucks in my area...in other words, that would be any 'mature' buck. So...I would say 'top' end bucks would be around 2%...or in other words, the top 20% of mature bucks.
#14
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
"Top end" (to me) would be oneof the top2-3 bucks in the woods I hunt. I'd consider a(fill in the blank")4.5 yr old half-rack MORE "top end" than a 110" 2.5 yr old.
"Top end" (to me) would be oneof the top2-3 bucks in the woods I hunt. I'd consider a(fill in the blank")4.5 yr old half-rack MORE "top end" than a 110" 2.5 yr old.
#15
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dinkster Dictionary [ A top end buck in my area would be considered 5.5 years on up, crop land fed and has been schooled for many years by careless hunters therfore being allowed the time to maximize wittyness, size and evasiveness]
<spelling sucks
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#16
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: Germ
So would Rob[8D]
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
"Top end" (to me) would be oneof the top2-3 bucks in the woods I hunt. I'd consider a(fill in the blank")4.5 yr old half-rack MORE "top end" than a 110" 2.5 yr old.
"Top end" (to me) would be oneof the top2-3 bucks in the woods I hunt. I'd consider a(fill in the blank")4.5 yr old half-rack MORE "top end" than a 110" 2.5 yr old.
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
LMAO!!!
Dan
#17
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would consider any buck that is an exceptional deer for my area to be a top end buck. Meaning, any buck that has more than the normal amount of headgear. Does not matter if it is a mature deer or not. If he is an exception to the norm, he is considered top end to me.
LT
LT