![[Deleted]](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/iconimages/bowhunting/deleted_ltr.gif)
[Deleted]
06-11-2008, 03:51 PM
#4
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: northern nj
Posts: 267
RE: Arrows: Vistory - Carbon Express. Comparison.
looks like you are setDroptine,9fps is not much of a difference but 2.5 inches of penetration would definetly be my choice ,not knocking down victory arrows couse i never tried them but i do like cx myself
06-11-2008, 05:16 PM
#8
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northeast Tennessee
Posts: 5,673
RE: Arrows: Vistory - Carbon Express. Comparison.
ORIGINAL: drenal
more foc on the cx
more foc on the cx
I would be willing to bet that the CE is less than 1% more in the FOC department. I shot them last year, and then switched to Gold Tip Pro Hunters. There wasn't much of a difference. Pure marketing gimmic in my opinion. Not saying they aren't good arrows because they are, the FOC part is bull though. Once again, I liked the arrows, they preformed great but it wasn't because of the weight forward.
06-11-2008, 06:22 PM
#9
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The OH-IO
Posts: 7,103
RE: Arrows: Vistory - Carbon Express. Comparison.
Who knows why. But it is what it is. Proof is in the results. CE penetrate more.
06-11-2008, 06:26 PM
#10
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,911
RE: Arrows: Vistory - Carbon Express. Comparison.
ORIGINAL: buckeye
[/align]
[/align]All that is really happening with a "better" penetrating arrow during practice is extra wear and tear on your target butt.
[/align]
[/align]
[/align]All that is really happening with a "better" penetrating arrow during practice is extra wear and tear on your target butt.
[/align]