The reason im against rages
#21
RE: The reason im against rages
I've never shot the Rage. But it's very difficult to believe a mech with a 2"cutting diameter is an appropriate head for a 50lb setup. Sure, there's footage of female celebrity hunters whacking deer with the Rage. Good for them.But there still won't be a Rage on the end of my arrow. Sorry.
EDIT: Just read the head in question is the three blade model. Still a no go, however.
EDIT: Just read the head in question is the three blade model. Still a no go, however.
#22
RE: The reason im against rages
ORIGINAL: Doegirl75
I've never shot the Rage. But it's very difficult to believe a mech with a 2" cutting diameter is an appropriate head for a 50lb setup. Sure, there's footage of female celebrity hunters whacking deer with the Rage. Good for them. But there still won't be a Rage on the end of my arrow. Sorry.
I've never shot the Rage. But it's very difficult to believe a mech with a 2" cutting diameter is an appropriate head for a 50lb setup. Sure, there's footage of female celebrity hunters whacking deer with the Rage. Good for them. But there still won't be a Rage on the end of my arrow. Sorry.
The recall was last year with heads that were shipped in March of 07'. Go to their website and it will explain everything!
#24
RE: The reason im against rages
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
To the original poster:
Don't despair!! I don't think I had found the perfect Broadhead when I was 13 either
Dan
To the original poster:
Don't despair!! I don't think I had found the perfect Broadhead when I was 13 either
Dan
#26
RE: The reason im against rages
ORIGINAL: mobow
That's cause they were still making them out of rocks, cowboy....
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
To the original poster:
Don't despair!! I don't think I had found the perfect Broadhead when I was 13 either
Dan
To the original poster:
Don't despair!! I don't think I had found the perfect Broadhead when I was 13 either
Dan
#27
RE: The reason im against rages
ORIGINAL: mobow
That's cause they were still making them out of rocks, cowboy....
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
To the original poster:
Don't despair!! I don't think I had found the perfect Broadhead when I was 13 either
Dan
To the original poster:
Don't despair!! I don't think I had found the perfect Broadhead when I was 13 either
Dan
Dan
#28
RE: The reason im against rages
ORIGINAL: DropTine249
50lbs is PLENTY enough to use a Rage. The Rage head would deploy if you pushed it through hot butter.
Like I have said before..Rages heads open so quickly, do so much damage and are so mean that sometimes when I look at them, they pop open just to remind me thattheirBAD A$$..
I think the issue with mechanicals and low poundage is penetration beyond skin. I could see circumstances that may result in a non pass through when using a Rage on a lower poundage bow.
if you feel that a cut on contact head makes you feel more confident, then use what you like and no one should judge.
50lbs is PLENTY enough to use a Rage. The Rage head would deploy if you pushed it through hot butter.
Like I have said before..Rages heads open so quickly, do so much damage and are so mean that sometimes when I look at them, they pop open just to remind me thattheirBAD A$$..
I think the issue with mechanicals and low poundage is penetration beyond skin. I could see circumstances that may result in a non pass through when using a Rage on a lower poundage bow.
if you feel that a cut on contact head makes you feel more confident, then use what you like and no one should judge.
#29
RE: The reason im against rages
When did you buy these? Their was a recall in the past.
ORIGINAL: Steven McBee
huh, thats weird, i wonder if i bot a messed up pack
ORIGINAL: psebwhntr16
We took the 3 blade Rages to Africa last year and had no problem with penetration on Wildebeest, Warthog, Lion or any other plains animals...All poundage was between 60-68lb.
We took the 3 blade Rages to Africa last year and had no problem with penetration on Wildebeest, Warthog, Lion or any other plains animals...All poundage was between 60-68lb.