try scorin this guy- UPDATE-SCORE & new angles IN ORIGINAL POST
#32
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would be interested in seeing the score sheet too. Them H measurements had to be huge on the left side, looked like it anyway. The G1 and G2's looked awfully long too but apparently they weren't being I was 20" high on the score. That was a hard pic to score. I think I would of been better off just looking at it and throwing a quick guess at it instead of actually trying to define each measurement on the rack like a normally do. Nice buck though!!!
#33
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson County, Missouri
Posts: 7,684
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would still like to see the other angles if you have them, interesting rack he had.
#34
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson County, Missouri
Posts: 7,684
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would be interested in seeing the score sheet too. Them H measurements had to be huge on the left side, looked like it anyway. The G1 and G2's looked awfully long too but apparently they weren't being I was 20" high on the score. That was a hard pic to score. I think I would of been better off just looking at it and throwing a quick guess at it instead of actually trying to define each measurement on the rack like a normally do. Nice buck though!!!
#36
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: xXxrory7xXx
eh im not sure if ill be able to find that, havent seen it in forever! dont know where that thing got off to!
I would be interested in seeing the score sheet too. Them H measurements had to be huge on the left side, looked like it anyway. The G1 and G2's looked awfully long too but apparently they weren't being I was 20" high on the score. That was a hard pic to score. I think I would of been better off just looking at it and throwing a quick guess at it instead of actually trying to define each measurement on the rack like a normally do. Nice buck though!!!
![Wink](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#38
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ahhh... missed it by 5"... I thought the mass on the left horn would carry it a bit further..... That deer below it on the wall went a shade over 130" though I suspect!
#39
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jefferson County, Missouri
Posts: 7,684
![Default](https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
ORIGINAL: SwampCollie
Ahhh... missed it by 5"... I thought the mass on the left horn would carry it a bit further..... That deer below it on the wall went a shade over 130" though I suspect!
Ahhh... missed it by 5"... I thought the mass on the left horn would carry it a bit further..... That deer below it on the wall went a shade over 130" though I suspect!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gsclift
Whitetail Deer Hunting
28
12-08-2008 08:05 PM
Rory/MO
Whitetail Deer Hunting
24
03-19-2008 11:12 AM