View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll
What do you think is more challenging?
02-20-2008, 06:24 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Warsaw, MO
Posts: 693
What do you think is more challenging?
The (boy some bow hunters make me angy) post got me thinking. What do you think is more of a challenging. I dont want any arguments, Just what do you think. I think Bow hunting would be because you have to have them close,you have to draw (lot more movement) And the deer have a little time to duck the arrow at a little longer yardeges. (lets say 35 On out)
02-20-2008, 06:31 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 3,465
RE: What do you think is more challenging?
I think both would be relatively easy to kill either a buck or doe over the course of a season with no size requirements. It aint rocket science, and small bucks are a dime a dozen around here. I couldn't count the number of shot opportunites i had over the course of last season at small bucks and does.
Each has there own set of challenges.
If i had money riding on killing a deer in one season, lets just say I'd rather have 4.5 months to pull it off with bow in hand, than <2 weeks with a gun.
Dontcha think the poll will be JUST a bit biased asking it in the BOWhunting forum as well?
Each has there own set of challenges.
If i had money riding on killing a deer in one season, lets just say I'd rather have 4.5 months to pull it off with bow in hand, than <2 weeks with a gun.
Dontcha think the poll will be JUST a bit biased asking it in the BOWhunting forum as well?
02-20-2008, 06:35 PM
#9
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,882
RE: What do you think is more challenging?
there really should be no contest i dont see how in this world gun hunting could be more of a challenge than bow, i do both, i can fill my tags with a gun, i shot a spike with my bow
02-20-2008, 06:41 PM
#10
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Warsaw, MO
Posts: 693
RE: What do you think is more challenging?
ORIGINAL: TEmbry
I think both would be relatively easy to kill either a buck or doe over the course of a season with no size requirements. It aint rocket science, and small bucks are a dime a dozen around here. I couldn't count the number of shot opportunites i had over the course of last season at small bucks and does.
Each has there own set of challenges.
If i had money riding on killing a deer in one season, lets just say I'd rather have 4.5 months to pull it off with bow in hand, than <2 weeks with a gun.
Dontcha think the poll will be JUST a bit biased asking it in the BOWhunting forum as well?
I think both would be relatively easy to kill either a buck or doe over the course of a season with no size requirements. It aint rocket science, and small bucks are a dime a dozen around here. I couldn't count the number of shot opportunites i had over the course of last season at small bucks and does.
Each has there own set of challenges.
If i had money riding on killing a deer in one season, lets just say I'd rather have 4.5 months to pull it off with bow in hand, than <2 weeks with a gun.
Dontcha think the poll will be JUST a bit biased asking it in the BOWhunting forum as well?