Gross vs Net
#21
RE: Gross vs Net
ORIGINAL: waiting_for_a_gift
Jayzus you guys, it's just a number, get over it! Net score is an indication of symetry, which is widely percieved as a desirable charachteristic. Nature is not perfect, so a high net score indicates a rare specimen, which is desirable.
It bugsme that nobody gets too excited about field dressed weight. To me, that's almost as much a trophy indicator as rack score.
Jayzus you guys, it's just a number, get over it! Net score is an indication of symetry, which is widely percieved as a desirable charachteristic. Nature is not perfect, so a high net score indicates a rare specimen, which is desirable.
It bugsme that nobody gets too excited about field dressed weight. To me, that's almost as much a trophy indicator as rack score.
#23
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 53
RE: Gross vs Net
They had a great article on this in the Fall edition of Pope and Young Newsletter/Magazine.
The people who came up with the scoring system did so to rank how "perfect" a rack is according to their vision, which was one wide but not too wide, and symetrical tines, and mass.
There is no such thing as a gross score, only the net counts. It is not listed on te\he B & C or P&Y score sheet anywhere. Only the net value. We only invented the term gross because it gives total antler lenght regardless of symmetry.
The net score is the ONLY way you can realistically compare two racks.
The people who came up with the scoring system did so to rank how "perfect" a rack is according to their vision, which was one wide but not too wide, and symetrical tines, and mass.
There is no such thing as a gross score, only the net counts. It is not listed on te\he B & C or P&Y score sheet anywhere. Only the net value. We only invented the term gross because it gives total antler lenght regardless of symmetry.
The net score is the ONLY way you can realistically compare two racks.
#24
RE: Gross vs Net
ORIGINAL: Insatiable
They had a great article on this in the Fall edition of Pope and Young Newsletter/Magazine.
The people who came up with the scoring system did so to rank how "perfect" a rack is according to their vision, which was one wide but not too wide, and symetrical tines, and mass.
There is no such thing as a gross score, only the net counts. It is not listed on te\he B & C or P&Y score sheet anywhere. Only the net value. We only invented the term gross because it gives total antler lenght regardless of symmetry.
The net score is the ONLY way you can realistically compare two racks.
They had a great article on this in the Fall edition of Pope and Young Newsletter/Magazine.
The people who came up with the scoring system did so to rank how "perfect" a rack is according to their vision, which was one wide but not too wide, and symetrical tines, and mass.
There is no such thing as a gross score, only the net counts. It is not listed on te\he B & C or P&Y score sheet anywhere. Only the net value. We only invented the term gross because it gives total antler lenght regardless of symmetry.
The net score is the ONLY way you can realistically compare two racks.
#25
RE: Gross vs Net
This is one of the main reasons why I will probably never enter any of my bucks.
I understand that you have to come up with a way to measure a deers antler size and for he most part I don't have a problem with what dimensions are measured: beam length, inside spread, tine length andcircumferences throughout the length of the antler. It may not be perfect but it pretty much covers it.
Where I have the problem is (like most of us) in the deductions. I think the problem is that a long time ago someone thought"symmetrical" is what everyone believes to be a perfect rack.
I for one, don't agree with that.
I understand that you have to come up with a way to measure a deers antler size and for he most part I don't have a problem with what dimensions are measured: beam length, inside spread, tine length andcircumferences throughout the length of the antler. It may not be perfect but it pretty much covers it.
Where I have the problem is (like most of us) in the deductions. I think the problem is that a long time ago someone thought"symmetrical" is what everyone believes to be a perfect rack.
I for one, don't agree with that.
#26
Fork Horn
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 434
RE: Gross vs Net
I think it was done so they could have a category for typical and non typical with some guidelines. If your buck has over so may inches of deductions then you can add them to the score and submit it as non typical. I mean you can't really say a buck is non typical because it has a 3" kicker off it's G2.It kinda makes it fair that way as far as having guidelines for what would be considered a non typical buck. I wish they would list the gross and net score though. That way you could see the numbers as far as how big the buck really is. If I remember right you can always enter it in the Buckmasters records. I don't think they deduct anything!...LOL
Darrall
Darrall
#28
RE: Gross vs Net
It is the Pope & Young CLUB and that being the keyword they have their own set of rules just like any other club would. If you do not like P&Y use Buckmasters scoring system and enter it there.
Do I agree with this no but it's the Club's rules plain and simple.
Do I agree with this no but it's the Club's rules plain and simple.
#29
RE: Gross vs Net
ORIGINAL: waiting_for_a_gift
Jayzus you guys, it's just a number, get over it! Net score is an indication of symetry, which is widely percieved as a desirable charachteristic. Nature is not perfect, so a high net score indicates a rare specimen, which is desirable.
It bugsme that nobody gets too excited about field dressed weight. To me, that's almost as much a trophy indicator as rack score.
Jayzus you guys, it's just a number, get over it! Net score is an indication of symetry, which is widely percieved as a desirable charachteristic. Nature is not perfect, so a high net score indicates a rare specimen, which is desirable.
It bugsme that nobody gets too excited about field dressed weight. To me, that's almost as much a trophy indicator as rack score.
#30
RE: Gross vs Net
ORIGINAL: FRALEY
It is the Pope & Young CLUB and that being the keyword they have their own set of rules just like any other club would.
It is the Pope & Young CLUB and that being the keyword they have their own set of rules just like any other club would.