Score this deer... Part 1 in a series.
#15
RE: Score this deer... Part 1 in a series.
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
WHY would you not count the abnormal points in the "Gross"?
WHY would you not count the abnormal points in the "Gross"?
The part of the P&Y/B&C scoring system that I don't like is that the abnormal points are not added into the gross score but yet they're subtracted from the gross score. This is for typicals. For non-typicals they are added to the net typical score.
For Buckeyes example..... I see 2 abnormal points (7-8 inches). For a typical score they are deducted from the gross even though they were not included in the first place. Why not just ignore them for a typical score??!!
#17
RE: Score this deer... Part 1 in a series.
The part of the P&Y/B&C scoring system that I don't like is that the abnormal points are not added into the gross score but yet they're subtracted from the gross score. This is for typicals. For non-typicals they are added to the net typical score.
Did I ask that right?
#18
RE: Score this deer... Part 1 in a series.
Until they change there scoring system everything should be net like they have it. Gross doesn't mean a darn thing when it comes to P@Y or B@C. Like it or not thats the way it is and I don't see it changing.
#20
RE: Score this deer... Part 1 in a series.
B&C will now include the gross score in the booksso you get the whole picture with only the net score of course counting.
ORIGINAL: Schultzy
Until they change there scoring system everything should be net like they have it. Gross doesn't mean a darn thing when it comes to P@Y or B@C. Like it or not thats the way it is and I don't see it changing.
Until they change there scoring system everything should be net like they have it. Gross doesn't mean a darn thing when it comes to P@Y or B@C. Like it or not thats the way it is and I don't see it changing.