Defending Mathews....
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Defending Mathews....
ORIGINAL: gutshot
After the post last week hammering Mathews for not coming out with anything earth shattering this year I went on the Hoyt and Bowtech websites to see what innovations that they've come up with and I've didn't see anything on either site that impressed me. Now I'm a "Mathews fanboy" and always will be but why isn't anybody slamming these other companies for their lack of innovation this year? Bring it on fella's
After the post last week hammering Mathews for not coming out with anything earth shattering this year I went on the Hoyt and Bowtech websites to see what innovations that they've come up with and I've didn't see anything on either site that impressed me. Now I'm a "Mathews fanboy" and always will be but why isn't anybody slamming these other companies for their lack of innovation this year? Bring it on fella's
I shot the new mathews real short bow last week, and can't believe they put out something so unbalanced. Just falls forward, and no way of putting on some wieght in teh back to balance it. I like the drenalin, lot like my bowtech liberty. But prefer the wider switchback limb design. I think it makes teh idler wheel more balanced.
#12
RE: Defending Mathews....
It's easy.....Mathews is and will sell a lot of bows because of their name. Their bows are great too, but nothing special. If you look back over the last few years of all the new bows Mathews has put out they all look identical. They are just not as innovative as Bowtech and other companies. Bowtech is willing to push to new extremes to get customers. You guys may say well Bowtech didnt come out with anything special this year either, and that's where you are wrong. Study the new bows for a few minutes and there are a lot of new features on the new bows. For example, you say the General isn't really new, but actually they took an idea and made it better. They made the limbs more than parrallel to reduce noise and vibration even more. They designed new cams to make the draw smoother that people complained about with the Guardian. They added a string suppressor and rollerguard which you say is from other companies. This may be true but they are adding these things to their bows to make the best bow out there. Mathews just needs to be more innovative and come up with a totally new design to catch back up.
#14
RE: Defending Mathews....
I'm a big fan of single cam bows and when looking for a new one I shot (tested) only single cam bows. There were many I liked and I even picked the Fred Bear Code over the Mathews. Well I was able to pick up a Switchback LD at a very...very good price figuring I'd have a backup to the Code.
After shooting it I realized I hadn't put enough arrows through in when looking for a new bow because if I had I'd have bought it before the Code. Now my Code is the backup bow.
I'm not brand loyal, I'll shoot anything that feels good. I may even give the hybrids/binary/cam 1/2 etc..another chance one day but for now I'm sticking to single cam bows and Mathews makes a great single cam bow.
I do agree with gutshot though....seems like folks LOVE to find fault with Mathews but give the other major manufacturers a pass. I even started a thread about it some time back if you all remember.
After shooting it I realized I hadn't put enough arrows through in when looking for a new bow because if I had I'd have bought it before the Code. Now my Code is the backup bow.
I'm not brand loyal, I'll shoot anything that feels good. I may even give the hybrids/binary/cam 1/2 etc..another chance one day but for now I'm sticking to single cam bows and Mathews makes a great single cam bow.
I do agree with gutshot though....seems like folks LOVE to find fault with Mathews but give the other major manufacturers a pass. I even started a thread about it some time back if you all remember.
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
RE: Defending Mathews....
ORIGINAL: BigJ71
I do agree with gutshot though....seems like folks LOVE to find fault with Mathews but give the other major manufacturers a pass. I even started a thread about it some time back if you all remember.
I do agree with gutshot though....seems like folks LOVE to find fault with Mathews but give the other major manufacturers a pass. I even started a thread about it some time back if you all remember.
You know, I look at mathews and it reminds me of knight rifles. They were the innovators. They made the rules. But they relied too much on thier disc line for too long. T/C came and blew them away. Now knight who used to own the market, is just coming behind T/C putting out copies trying to get back the marketshare. It will happen to mathews too.
#16
RE: Defending Mathews....
BigJ....
Left alone....I find NO FAULT in a MAthews bow, AT ALL. Compared to most other bows....I still think they are superior. I just don't think they're the most innovative, cutting-edge bow mfr. out there, right now. There are better options (IMO).
No "fault" in them, at all, though.....and I hope my posts didn't come across that way.
Left alone....I find NO FAULT in a MAthews bow, AT ALL. Compared to most other bows....I still think they are superior. I just don't think they're the most innovative, cutting-edge bow mfr. out there, right now. There are better options (IMO).
No "fault" in them, at all, though.....and I hope my posts didn't come across that way.
#17
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Elkview WV
Posts: 2,369
RE: Defending Mathews....
Mo Mighty so are you saying that Bowtech put technology on their bows that other companies come up with and this puts them above the rest, or am I just reading it wrong?
#18
RE: Defending Mathews....
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
BigJ....
Left alone....I find NO FAULT in a MAthews bow, AT ALL. Compared to most other bows....I still think they are superior. I just don't think they're the most innovative, cutting-edge bow mfr. out there, right now. There are better options (IMO).
No "fault" in them, at all, though.....and I hope my posts didn't come across that way.
BigJ....
Left alone....I find NO FAULT in a MAthews bow, AT ALL. Compared to most other bows....I still think they are superior. I just don't think they're the most innovative, cutting-edge bow mfr. out there, right now. There are better options (IMO).
No "fault" in them, at all, though.....and I hope my posts didn't come across that way.
I don't think they've been the most innovative or cutting edge lately either, but I don't think they have to be....not with a single cam bow. They've pretty much got a good thing going and have them down pretty good right now. They produce a good lineup of great shooting bows...not much more to ask for.
As technology advances so will their designs you can bet on it, but there are only so many new advances that are discovered each year. New cam designs are an area that Mathews has kept up with the pace. It's not as "in your face" as the new riser design (very cool BTW) Bowtech came out with but an advancement none the less.
Personally I think a lot of people are missing the boat with the Switchback LD. The reason is because it's not fast, but I don't think you can ask too much more in a hunting bow 33 1/2 AtoA 9in brace height and a straight riser design make it idealas a stable hunting platform.
#19
RE: Defending Mathews....
ORIGINAL: gutshot
Mo Mighty so are you saying that Bowtech put technology on their bows that other companies come up with and this puts them above the rest, or am I just reading it wrong?
Mo Mighty so are you saying that Bowtech put technology on their bows that other companies come up with and this puts them above the rest, or am I just reading it wrong?
#20
RE: Defending Mathews....
How many Mathews guys have we heard on here wishing they would redesign their grips? What about the strings they use? Why won't they switch to a better string and cable setup?
These are two areas I think they could improve upon to make a better bow and not cost themselves ANYTHING. This isn't a "cut" on the company....just a suggestion!
These are two areas I think they could improve upon to make a better bow and not cost themselves ANYTHING. This isn't a "cut" on the company....just a suggestion!