204" buck taken in Wis.
#12
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
Wanna make a bet it is? He shot it like 5 min from where I hunt in Wisconsin. Gross score was 203 or 204. It's a 15 pointer. It isn't that wide but the tine length is huge. I know for a fact of what it scored so believe whatever but that's how it is.
#13
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
OK I did the leg-work to post the pic again...
#14
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
ORIGINAL: solocamcan
x3.........that is No way over 200.
ORIGINAL: USAF_hunter
It's not 204 inches nice though. Phenominal buck no less.
It's not 204 inches nice though. Phenominal buck no less.
UnlessI could see the rack better to measureit, I couldnt say one way or the other about his size.
#15
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
ORIGINAL: npockat32
That's not the buck. Christ I hunt like 5 min from where the kid hunts. I live in Wisconsin and you live in PA. I think I know what I am talking about more than you do.
OK I did the leg-work to post the pic again...
#16
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
Awesome buck! It's hard to tell from the picture, but he obviously has a lot of typ & non-typ points, including a lot we don't see in the picture.
#17
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
ORIGINAL: npockat32
That's not the buck. Christ I hunt like 5 min from where the kid hunts. I live in Wisconsin and you live in PA. I think I know what I am talking about more than you do.
OK I did the leg-work to post the pic again...
I'm not surprised you don't have a good pic, they probably don't like ya either!
#18
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
LOL wow, a little sensitive there npockat32 arent ya??
#19
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
Geez sorry your Majesty..was just trying to post the pic the original poster said, he didn't have one of the big buck from Big Falls..this was posted last week.
I'm not surprised you don't have a good pic, they probably don't like ya either!
ORIGINAL: npockat32
That's not the buck. Christ I hunt like 5 min from where the kid hunts. I live in Wisconsin and you live in PA. I think I know what I am talking about more than you do.
OK I did the leg-work to post the pic again...
I'm not surprised you don't have a good pic, they probably don't like ya either!
#20
RE: 204" buck taken in Wis.
Simmer down npockat, no one is calling you out, just stating what they see and their opinion.
I don't question the 200" part, man look at the eye guards on that thing, that one has to be atleast 10-11". Nice deer none the less, 160" or 200", it doesn't matter.
I don't question the 200" part, man look at the eye guards on that thing, that one has to be atleast 10-11". Nice deer none the less, 160" or 200", it doesn't matter.