pay hunts
#21
Typical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: RAYVILLE,LA.
Posts: 818
RE: pay hunts
ORIGINAL: Phil from Maine
Sorry I missed uderstood, I think what you are reffering to is what I call canned hunting and that is a big NO-WAY!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's the wayI see it too but, a lot of people do, and go after large trophy deer that are wild. They do not always score either but, they still like to go..
I'm not talking about an outfitter that helps you get on game.I'm talking about the type game ranches that bring in a client to shot a trophy game animal but not "hunt" it.you know like hey client which one do you want to shoot? I want to make this perfectly clear I would not hesitate to book a hunt with outfitter that cold give me the chance to hunt a trophy whitetail in fair chase conditions. I know I will probably never kill a true trophy in my hunting area.
Imust sayI have never had a desire to hunt Canada so I don't care what laws they have or pass. I'm talking the good old U S of A. If you or anyone else wants to hunt out side the US, go for it, hire a guide or whatever you have to do, that's fine with me.
#22
RE: pay hunts
ORIGINAL: treboryerf
Hey guys.Wanted to get your opions about the big money hunts some people go on then display their "trophies" for the world to see and then classify themseves as a trophy hunter.Don't get me wrong I'm not saying there is anything wrong with paying an outfitter for the chance at a trophy animal,I'm talking about the hunts where the guides let you know what animal to shot and then charge you by the inches.You know the type hunts where a client can spend 10,000 dollars or more for a deer.Oh yea these are the same guys that look down at us hunters that take a lesser animal too.
Hey guys.Wanted to get your opions about the big money hunts some people go on then display their "trophies" for the world to see and then classify themseves as a trophy hunter.Don't get me wrong I'm not saying there is anything wrong with paying an outfitter for the chance at a trophy animal,I'm talking about the hunts where the guides let you know what animal to shot and then charge you by the inches.You know the type hunts where a client can spend 10,000 dollars or more for a deer.Oh yea these are the same guys that look down at us hunters that take a lesser animal too.
It aint hunting to meand neither is paying a hooker for sex. There's no thrill in the hunt but the more you pay the better looking the trophy is and there is a market for it.
#23
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Bradford, Ontario
Posts: 2,205
RE: pay hunts
What you're describing is a canned hunt which isn't hunting at all. Its a way for well heeled guys to shoot big animals in a pen. No respect for that at all. Using an outfitter to hunt a new territory or animal that is not available locally is fine . I have used outfitters and will again. Its just not practical to travel thousands of miles and expect to just walk into game within a week long hunt many times.
#25
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Southern Maryland
Posts: 140
RE: pay hunts
Never a canned hunt, for every reason already stated on here. However, I would pay an outfitter if I was going to say... Colorado to hunt for Elk. I wouldn't have any idea on how to start, and if I only had a week I would want to maximize my chance.
Ken
Ken
#26
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Carolina Low Country
Posts: 182
RE: pay hunts
I totally agree there is a difference between canned hunts and fair chase hunts and thats the issue, not whether you hire someone to help you hunt. Personally I can see hiring an outfitter as long as the hunt is fair chase.
I still say if that trophy animal is harvested non-fair chase it should not go in the record books or atleast identified as a non-fair chase harvest. Maybe the sponsors would not be so quick to promote someone who is not an ethical hunter. Stop the money train and these canned hunts I beleive will be reduced or totally illiminated.
I always here about people who are making $300-500per hour and that there time is more valuable thensay someone who earns $20 per hour. What a bunch of %^&*.Everybodyis time poor today. Its just a matter of priorities and taking the time off.To ethically hunt speaks volumes about your character. These canned hunts and the so calledkillers should be banned from ever hunting anywhere, finned and disclosed to the public.They don't respect nature and are a poisin to our sport.
I still say if that trophy animal is harvested non-fair chase it should not go in the record books or atleast identified as a non-fair chase harvest. Maybe the sponsors would not be so quick to promote someone who is not an ethical hunter. Stop the money train and these canned hunts I beleive will be reduced or totally illiminated.
I always here about people who are making $300-500per hour and that there time is more valuable thensay someone who earns $20 per hour. What a bunch of %^&*.Everybodyis time poor today. Its just a matter of priorities and taking the time off.To ethically hunt speaks volumes about your character. These canned hunts and the so calledkillers should be banned from ever hunting anywhere, finned and disclosed to the public.They don't respect nature and are a poisin to our sport.
#27
RE: pay hunts
Well...let's clarify this a little. First off...what your describing is not a canned hunt. You said that a hunter is paying x dollars for a specific deer that the owner has scouted out on his land. Every outfitter I know has a pretty good idea of what deer are on his land, where they travel and where to put you to get a good shot at it. Some of them charge x dollars regardless of the deer shot while others charge x dollars depending upon the size of the deer taken. Both are free roaming whitetails that have been scouted. The only difference in your scenario is the pricing structure. NOW...if you would have said a high fence operation that purchases privately bred deer then that is a whole different story. In fact, here is the pricing structure for King Ranch in Texas. Someone may pay $20,000.00 for a whitetail but they didn't hunt it any different than someone who paid 3,000.00 in Illinois. They're still hunting 825,000 acres from a stand on pre-scouted ground. They're just paying more.
White-tailed deer
Hunt #1
(3 days)
up to a 150 Boone & Crockett Gross Score $5,500.00 flat fee
151 - 170 B&C, $5,500 plus $200.00 per point above the 150 B&C gross score
171 - 180 B&C, $5,500 plus $250.00 per point above the 150 B&C gross score
181 - 199 B&C, $15,000
200+ B&C, $20,000
White-tailed deer
Hunt #1
(3 days)
up to a 150 Boone & Crockett Gross Score $5,500.00 flat fee
151 - 170 B&C, $5,500 plus $200.00 per point above the 150 B&C gross score
171 - 180 B&C, $5,500 plus $250.00 per point above the 150 B&C gross score
181 - 199 B&C, $15,000
200+ B&C, $20,000
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LAK Hunting
Hunts/Outfitters
0
05-05-2008 07:42 AM
JeremyKS
Hunts/Outfitters
2
03-04-2008 10:20 AM
huntingtime1975
Hunts/Outfitters
5
01-22-2007 10:04 PM
dhays
Hunts/Outfitters
0
08-25-2006 01:14 PM
bncredriver
Hunts/Outfitters
0
07-20-2006 12:12 AM