outdoorsmen

what do you think is the more effective head the 2" 2-blade or the 1.5" 3-blade? sure a 1/2" difference but the 3-blade will give you more surface cutting area but more resistance.
the 2 blade will only be a 1/4" longer on each blade, but the 3 blade will give you a whole other blade (don't know how long the actual blade is) that will cause tissue damage.
so it would be 3 wound channels compared to 2 wound channels.

JNTURK

i just baught 6 rage 2" (ebay) .... most veins and arteries in heart and lungs run vertical and lateral.....so having the extra .5" was a plus for me and why i choose them..

MichaelHunsucker

I would probably go with the extra cutting diameter as well. Especially for turkey

Mike Hill

I just love the hole the 3 blades make. To me the wider hole is more effective. Has anyone shot the practice head yet. How does it hit compared to the regular heads.

Roskoe

I have shot the 2 blade practice heads quite a bit. They fly just like field points. Been afraid to shoot the actual Rage hunting head - I'mconcernedI won't be able to pull it out of a broad head target because of its design. Only hope would be that it would come out the backside a couple of inches - where you could unscrew it before pulling the arrow shaft back out the way it went in.

Rob/PA Bowyer

I've shot 5 bucks with the 2 blade Snyper, (same style) and the holes have been unbelievable. I've also now seen many of the "tv personalities" use them (2 blade Rage) as well now with incredible results. My buddy shot the 3 blade, I was not as impressed with them, very deadly results however, I've witnessed bigger entrance and exit holes with the 2 blade for whatever reason.

Just my personal observation.