Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
#82
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
And I ask you, where did the pic come?
And I ask you, where did the pic come?
How much carbon is in the clothing?
#83
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
I will ask you for the sixth time now aero,
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
Please explain.
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
Please explain.
#84
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
ORIGINAL: ash2042
Hopefully this thread locked just like the same one HCH posted on archerytalk. I am not for threeads being locked but this one is going absolutely no where.
Hopefully this thread locked just like the same one HCH posted on archerytalk. I am not for threeads being locked but this one is going absolutely no where.
#85
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
And you can say the same about non-carbon users!
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
Couldn't agree more. Prime example of why most carbon users don't even waste their time posting.
ORIGINAL: ash2042
Hopefully this thread locked just like the same one HCH posted on archerytalk. I am not for threeads being locked but this one is going absolutely no where.
Hopefully this thread locked just like the same one HCH posted on archerytalk. I am not for threeads being locked but this one is going absolutely no where.
#86
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
ORIGINAL: atlasman
10 out of 24 responders (owners) in Buckeye's thread.....that's 41%
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
I find them by far to be the MINORITY of carbon clothing users.
I find them by far to be the MINORITY of carbon clothing users.
ORIGINAL: atlasman
You don't seem to mind when the carbon companies do it though.
Are you saying that all the people who report owning the suit with negative comments are lying?
Its easy to come on the internet and make claims you don't have to substantiate.
Are you saying that all the people who report owning the suit with negative comments are lying?
I too have ascentlok jacketthat I bought on a clearance rack at Cabelas and a scentlock face mask.
I have not worn it ......(edited. Not trying to make anyone look bad, just show some truth)
I know I went through many sets of it in the early 90's and you dont reactivate carbon clothing.
#87
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
Where are you getting 10 USERS in the thread that say they were not satisfied. Strech.
Where are you getting 10 USERS in the thread that say they were not satisfied. Strech.
I would never rely on it though
I do but I don't think that it makes any difference.
I never saw a difference one way or another, so I stopped wearing it.
I am not sure if it works or not.
Yes I have worn Scent-Lok, this year I went to X-Scents products.
I don't believe it lasted as long or recharges as easily as they say.
I USED IT THIS PAST SEASON AND DIDN'T KNOW IF IT MADE A DIFFERENCE OR NOT.
I have a whole scent lok suit sometimes i wear it sometimes i dont have never noticed a difference either way.
Not sure how effective it is or isn't yet
No stretch.
Let me help you. I'm not trying to call anyone out but obviously someone hasn't been paying attention to what's being said around here. The following posts were by the same author in different threads.
#88
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
I will ask you for the seventh time now aero,
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
Please explain.
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
Please explain.
#89
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
ORIGINAL: atlasman
These are all from carbon suit USERS in that thread.
I would hardly classify those as complaints. If that's as bad of complaints as you can come up with I can certainly see why carbon clothing enjoys such success.
The other member has complaints about the garment.......not specifics about it's effectiveness.
No stretch.
You're right........I haven't, because I don't care. I find it funny that you are monitoring and keeping track of other members comments on carbon but you claim it is others who have the "woody" about this topic.
Yes, I know I'm right. You don't care. Pretty convenient. You question me about the validity of some of the posters claims but when you see the truth you "don't care". It's not keeping track, it's called paying attention. You slam REAL USERS because they tell their true, positive experiences then want to cite NON USERS testimonials, then say you don't care when presented with the truth. So, with you, its "if own it and say it works, you don't know what you're talking about", but anybody whose never used it or says they do and slams it, then they are right. Nice.
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
Where are you getting 10 USERS in the thread that say they were not satisfied. Strech.
Where are you getting 10 USERS in the thread that say they were not satisfied. Strech.
I would hardly classify those as complaints. If that's as bad of complaints as you can come up with I can certainly see why carbon clothing enjoys such success.
I would never rely on it though
I do but I don't think that it makes any difference.
I never saw a difference one way or another, so I stopped wearing it.
I am not sure if it works or not.
Yes I have worn Scent-Lok, this year I went to X-Scents products.
I don't believe it lasted as long or recharges as easily as they say.
I USED IT THIS PAST SEASON AND DIDN'T KNOW IF IT MADE A DIFFERENCE OR NOT.
I have a whole scent lok suit sometimes i wear it sometimes i dont have never noticed a difference either way.
Not sure how effective it is or isn't yet
No stretch.
Let me help you. I'm not trying to call anyone out but obviously someone hasn't been paying attention to what's being said around here. The following posts were by the same author in different threads.
Yes, I know I'm right. You don't care. Pretty convenient. You question me about the validity of some of the posters claims but when you see the truth you "don't care". It's not keeping track, it's called paying attention. You slam REAL USERS because they tell their true, positive experiences then want to cite NON USERS testimonials, then say you don't care when presented with the truth. So, with you, its "if own it and say it works, you don't know what you're talking about", but anybody whose never used it or says they do and slams it, then they are right. Nice.
#90
RE: Why do the two carbon clothing manufacturers...
ORIGINAL: atlasman
I will ask you for the seventh time now aero,
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
Please explain.
I will ask you for the seventh time now aero,
Please explain how the suit eliminates your scent at a significant level (forget the regeneration stuff for this discussion) considering the photo that I showed you with no more then 30% of the surface area of the fabric containing carbon particles..........also considering that physics dictates that airflow (and other forms of matter) will ALWAYS follow the path of least resistance which in any non air tight garment would be the neck, arm, waist, and leg openings. Even assuming ALL the air from inside the suit got somehow forced through the garment (which everyone knows doesn't happen) 70% of it will never even touch the carbon.
Please explain.