hardcorehunter

Yes it is my opinion from the research on carbon that itcan't be regenerated in a homeowners dryer. Like I said, someone please post some info proving otherwise. Remember, an advertisement on a carbon clothing makers websiteis NOT PROOF.

GMMAT

Don...Atlas.....

I'm not going to argue with you about it. I'm simply saying that I don't believe 100% of EVRYTHING th emanufacturer tells me.....but I DO believe that there is SOME amount of regeneration that's occurring. It all boils down to $$, then (Like I've said ALL ALONG). I'm willing to pay the extra amount for (_____%) increase in scent control. I don't blame anyone who isn't willing to pay it, and I certainly don't see anyone who DOES pay the extra amount telling anyone who isn't.....that they're stupid for not doing so.

I happen to believe the manufacturer TO SOME DEGREE. others who do are simply saying they're willing to pay for that (________) level of belief.

So.....unless you believe that these items help NONE.....andCAN'T be regenerated AT ANY LEVEL......then you're saying you're not willing to pay extra for the (_____%) added security. It's really that simple.

Webelieve the manufacturers' claims......to the degreethese garmentshelpus "SOME". I never bought a Big Mac that looked like the one on the poster.....but to SOME degree.....they're still pretty good hamburgers.

GMMAT

Hey Don...

If that's what you believe.....then I wouldn't spend extra on it, either.

ash2042

Don, I think if any of the companies have read your posts they would rather not have you buy their garments. Why do they "NEED" to have three scientists give unbiased reports,and who is us, I thought it was you.In this next qoute it seems to be I, I, I. So you have the 3 scientists names and credentials to back it up. Because from my research it is my opinion that it can be regenerated in a household dryer. See how childish this sounds.

Rmember, I think this is thefirst this was mentioned, but I could be wrong.
This is what I "remember" you saying. The companies produced the answers it just wasn't the answer you wanted.

It seems that you have already had 3 scientists do research for you to help you come to this opinion. You feel that it cannot be regenerated in a household dryer, thats good you are entitled to your opinion. You wanted proof from the company that it could be regenerated in a household dryer, it was shown to you and that wasn't good enough, now you want 3 scientists to prove it. I do not think any of the carbon clothing manufacturers have anyhting to prove to you. I feel the answer is very simple, if you believe what the company says buy it, if not don't, but quit arguing over something you have already researched. You are not a customer of carbon clothing, if you are a potntial customer of carbon clothing I would contact the company and ask them for the proof you need to buy it. I am sure they would hire 3 scientists to prove to Don that it can be regenerated in a household dryer, just so they can sell oneor two sets. I am also sure that the companies are pleased to see all this attention given to their products, be it poitive or negative.

hardcorehunter

Everybody keeps skirting the question; show me some proof that indeed some desorbtion/regeneration/reactivation takes place at 140 degrees in a homeowners' dryer. That is 1360 degrees LESS than what the carbon reactivation companies use to reactivate carbon.

GMMAT

Don:

Nobody's skirting anything. You asked us (basically) if we believed the mfg's claims. I told you I did TO A DEGREE (no pun intended).

I/we think they can be regenerated SOME, and we're willing to pay extra for it. You've stated that your belief is they can't be regenerated to ANY degree.

Your charge is like asking Ruth's Chris to PROVE that their steaks taste good. Why would they feel compelledto prove it.....when none of their customers are complaining about it??????

Campo

If carbon is science, I suppose we should listen to the studies that say it doesnt work[8D]

ash2042

Don your just not getting it. Why do WE need to show YOU proof. By the way we did show you proof, don't skirt the answer. I answered your ORIGINAL question almost exactly and then you throw more stuff out. DON YOUR ORIGINAL QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSERWED. If your not happy with the answer drop it. If you can't drop it you hire 3 scientist to prove it to you. Most on HERE have nothing to prove to you.

bigbulls

I have argued about this stuff before and decided to pretty much stay out of this one. I would like to post one comment though.

The bottom line is this.... These carbon clothing mfgrs. will never get any unbiased scientific testing done to prove that this type of clothing does, in fact, do exactly what they claim it does. So long as they are paying enough "pro's" to wear it which, in turn, gets enough"Joe Consumers"to purchase it they will have enough people thinking that it does work. They are making millions because of this so why would they risk disproving themselves? Which would, in all likelyhood, happen.

The fact is, there is more than enough real scientific data to disprove everything that the clothing manufacturers claim if "Joe Consumer" would simply take the time to educate themselves rather than believing what the "pro's" and the advertising tells them.

GMMAT

Edited:

Not worth it.

Have a good one, guys.