Drenaline vs. X force video
02-23-2007, 02:04 PM
#1
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 484
02-23-2007, 02:10 PM
#2
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,006
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
Cool deal.
If I ever decide to go hunting for ballistics gel I'll use the PSE, I guess.
Would have been more interesting had they backed up to even ten yards. Were they afraid they were going to miss the target?
If I ever decide to go hunting for ballistics gel I'll use the PSE, I guess.
Would have been more interesting had they backed up to even ten yards. Were they afraid they were going to miss the target?
02-23-2007, 03:08 PM
#5
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jacksonville, IL/ Huntington, WV
Posts: 1,573
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
Yeah this really doesn't prove much to me. I'm sure if it were the Mathews guys performing the test they would have done what it took to make the drenaline look good instead of the PSE. Whatever though, if your impressed go buy the X force.
02-23-2007, 03:24 PM
#6
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Milwaukee WI
Posts: 1,161
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
They're comparing a 350 fps bow to a 320 fps bow. The two aren'treally in the same class the way I see it.Then again it's of course undeniable that they're both 70lb bows. Kinda scores one for PSE's engineering.
02-23-2007, 03:27 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Indiana PA USA
Posts: 3,656
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
Yeah, but that test doesn't factor in forgiveness, quietness, and how shock free the bows are. Give me the choice and I would have the Drenaline over the X Force, I could care less which has more penetration in balistic gel as both have enough power to blast a broadhead tipped arrow through a deer and I personally feel that the Drenaline would be more comfortable and forgiving while doing so.
02-23-2007, 04:09 PM
#8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
ORIGINAL: Buck Magnet
Yeah, but that test doesn't factor in forgiveness, quietness, and how shock free the bows are. Give me the choice and I would have the Drenaline over the X Force, I could care less which has more penetration in balistic gel as both have enough power to blast a broadhead tipped arrow through a deer and I personally feel that the Drenaline would be more comfortable and forgiving while doing so.
Yeah, but that test doesn't factor in forgiveness, quietness, and how shock free the bows are. Give me the choice and I would have the Drenaline over the X Force, I could care less which has more penetration in balistic gel as both have enough power to blast a broadhead tipped arrow through a deer and I personally feel that the Drenaline would be more comfortable and forgiving while doing so.
BTW..............I thought it wasn't good to turn a single limb bolt that many turns.......he went 2 full turns on one bolt. I was under the impression you should only go 1/2-1 full turn and then do the other bolt to keep them close.
02-23-2007, 04:19 PM
#9
Host of Hosts
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Erie, Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,780
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
Holy cow did you see the bend in those limbs? I didn't like the looks of that. I used to shoot PSE and liked them. That is until they started treating their dealers like second class citizens and selling to the big chain stores.
02-23-2007, 04:28 PM
#10
Typical Buck
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NW Illinois
Posts: 697
RE: Drenaline vs. X force video
I would like to see it compared to a speed bow, not a hunting bow! Why not shot it against Mathews black max 2 @ 330IBO. At least it’s a speed bow. Or Pete why don’t you have the same test with your top of the line hunting bow, the Mach X NX cam vs. Drenaline? Oh yeh the Mach X’s IBO rating is only 312-304. Personally I if I wanted power I would look at the Bowtech Allegiance with 327-335 IBO and a more forgiving brace at least this is a hunting bow. PSE: Pete Shepleys Ego .