The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
#81
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
What the heck, i'll bite! Man this quote thing is a pain to figure out! I'll give ya credit for that Atlas..you have that part down.
you did when you asked for consensus agreement
Note the " " your words not mine.
ORIGINAL: atlasman
No, I would never agree to a blanket statement like that!
I wasn't making a "blanket statement".
No, I would never agree to a blanket statement like that!
I wasn't making a "blanket statement".
you did when you asked for consensus agreement
Not much effort..is the "hunt" then diminished to "shooting"? By your (or the concensus') opinion?
I thought you didn't like blanket statements?? Read the thread. I summed up what everyone else has said already. I have yet to state my opinion either way
I thought you didn't like blanket statements?? Read the thread. I summed up what everyone else has said already. I have yet to state my opinion either way
#82
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Hunting for me is defined by how I do it. Hunting for a man in Texas/Fla/IA (insert any other region)is probably defined byhow he does it............. although it is probably a lot different than the way I go about things.
There are tactics and methodsthat I would not do simply because I like the way I do it best, not because the otherguy is wrong.That's why it's so enjoyable to me.
It's my way on my time. I only have to be within the rule of law and I have to please nobody but myself in regards to if I sit or stalk; hunt over a feeder or open timber;use a gun or a bow; shoot a spike or a yearlingor a mature buck. It's my choice and that's what makes ALL of "HUNTING" great for me.
I also like to learn and try out new things each year and that's the reason I am on here.
There are tactics and methodsthat I would not do simply because I like the way I do it best, not because the otherguy is wrong.That's why it's so enjoyable to me.
It's my way on my time. I only have to be within the rule of law and I have to please nobody but myself in regards to if I sit or stalk; hunt over a feeder or open timber;use a gun or a bow; shoot a spike or a yearlingor a mature buck. It's my choice and that's what makes ALL of "HUNTING" great for me.
I also like to learn and try out new things each year and that's the reason I am on here.
#84
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
you did when you asked for consensus agreement
you did when you asked for consensus agreement
Note the " " your words not mine.
#85
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: HuntinGUS
Hunting for me is defined by how I do it. Hunting for a man in Texas/Fla/IA (insert any other region)is probably defined byhow he does it............. although it is probably a lot different than the way I go about things.
There are tactics and methodsthat I would not do simply because I like the way I do it best, not because the otherguy is wrong.That's why it's so enjoyable to me.
It's my way on my time. I only have to be within the rule of law and I have to please nobody but myself in regards to if I sit or stalk; hunt over a feeder or open timber;use a gun or a bow; shoot a spike or a yearlingor a mature buck. It's my choice and that's what makes ALL of "HUNTING" great for me.
I also like to learn and try out new things each year and that's the reason I am on here.
Hunting for me is defined by how I do it. Hunting for a man in Texas/Fla/IA (insert any other region)is probably defined byhow he does it............. although it is probably a lot different than the way I go about things.
There are tactics and methodsthat I would not do simply because I like the way I do it best, not because the otherguy is wrong.That's why it's so enjoyable to me.
It's my way on my time. I only have to be within the rule of law and I have to please nobody but myself in regards to if I sit or stalk; hunt over a feeder or open timber;use a gun or a bow; shoot a spike or a yearlingor a mature buck. It's my choice and that's what makes ALL of "HUNTING" great for me.
I also like to learn and try out new things each year and that's the reason I am on here.
The simple fact is that in many threads lately I have seen comments like "They aren't "hunting"........or "That's more "shooting" then "hunting". These comments can be found in just about EVERY thread that mentions fences, bait, food plots, outfitters, long range rifles, drives, "guaranteed" kills etc. My question was where do YOU draw the line?.......I believe the answer to that question is VERY subjective and many things can be involved in forming that opinion.
#87
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
#88
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Maybe one day we will learn respect each other and how they choose to enjoy the outdoors.
#89
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IOWA/25' UP
Posts: 7,145
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: Germ
To much pondering, really does not matter what people do Atlas or what they call it.
Maybe one day we will learn respect what each other and how they choose to enjoy the outdoors.
Maybe one day we will learn respect what each other and how they choose to enjoy the outdoors.