The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
#61
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: davidmil
Ya'll worry to much. It's suppose to be fun. If you're all worried about how the other guy does it... you really aren't having much fun.
Ya'll worry to much. It's suppose to be fun. If you're all worried about how the other guy does it... you really aren't having much fun.
I really think you are missing the point on this one. A lot of threads have popped up lately with comments somewhere in them stating......."That's not "hunting"..........or "They aren't "hunters"........."That's more "shooting" then "hunting"
My question is where is the line for you personally??......or maybe there is no "line" and you just consider it all "hunting" assuming it's legal (but you have already stated that is not your opinion.)
#62
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Atlas.....nice try.
The answer to your question is......because the deer I'm after are in jeopardy of being downed by another hunter.....free to run to the next STATE if they want to........succeptible to predators from other areas.......and basically just free to say...."I don't like it here....I'm leaving".
Part of being an all around "hunter"....(since we're throwing opinions around) is being able to keep your FREE RANGING deer in the area you hunt. Why do people plant food plots (really)? Why do we supplemental feed? Why do we keep supplying our mineral sites with minerals? Why do we make sure the creeks flow, properly? Why do we fell trees to aid in bedding habitat? Why? Why? Why?
It's really not that hard an anser.....if you didn't have one in mind you were looking and fishing for to match your own opinion.
The answer to your question is......because the deer I'm after are in jeopardy of being downed by another hunter.....free to run to the next STATE if they want to........succeptible to predators from other areas.......and basically just free to say...."I don't like it here....I'm leaving".
Part of being an all around "hunter"....(since we're throwing opinions around) is being able to keep your FREE RANGING deer in the area you hunt. Why do people plant food plots (really)? Why do we supplemental feed? Why do we keep supplying our mineral sites with minerals? Why do we make sure the creeks flow, properly? Why do we fell trees to aid in bedding habitat? Why? Why? Why?
It's really not that hard an anser.....if you didn't have one in mind you were looking and fishing for to match your own opinion.
#63
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,131
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
A guy in my league last night was talking about a buffalo bow hunt he went on last year.....guided of course.
He was able to walk up within 20yds of the buffalo and the guide was like "hmmmm.....shoot the one on the left"
Personally, this was shooting to me. Not much different, in my opinion, than walking out into a pasture and shooting a cow with a bow.
He was able to walk up within 20yds of the buffalo and the guide was like "hmmmm.....shoot the one on the left"
Personally, this was shooting to me. Not much different, in my opinion, than walking out into a pasture and shooting a cow with a bow.
#64
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: indianahunter83
For me fair chase is basically no high fences. I have no problem with scents or food plots but corn feeders and salt blocks are just kind of un-natural.
For me fair chase is basically no high fences. I have no problem with scents or food plots but corn feeders and salt blocks are just kind of un-natural.
The 100 yard range is just because I like being close enough to the deer to count the number of eyelashes it has! Don't get me wrong... I've shot deer with my .270 at up to 200 yards (because they are tasty no matter how they perish!) but it just didn't seem as exciting as being up close and personal.
My father isn't much of a hunter (mostly squirrels he doesn't understand the joy I get from freezing temperatures stuck up in a tree) so I pretty much was drawn to hunting on my own and formed my own ideas. I also never understood deer drives (once again illegal in indiana I believe which probably caused my opinion)
WOW........this is EXACTLY the kind of response I was looking for.........so much goes into what we consider "hunting" and that phrase can mean a 1,000 different things to a 1,000 different guys. Your dad didn't care for hunting so much........mine did and still does. He is a great hunter........but he is hardcore old school.......I share many of his opinions and some I don't......that influence of how we are raised or come into the sport has a lot to do with how we view what is different IMO. Guys out west laugh at the thought of a treestand..........out east they laugh at open prarie long distance rifle shots. I don't think either is right or wrong. Deer drives are a GREAT example...........but I told my wife 15 minutes ago I was going to get us some coffee [] Gotta run out for a few...........good post though man.
#65
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: GR8atta2d
Pretty easy for me!
Hunting = I am pursuing a game animal. With the intent of killing it, if opportunity presents itself.
Shooting = I am target shootingwithout pursuing a living animal.
Only the ethics of the given individual would put one in a situation where the line becomes cloudy. At that point it's not for me to judge, if, you are hunting be legal means.
Pretty easy for me!
Hunting = I am pursuing a game animal. With the intent of killing it, if opportunity presents itself.
Shooting = I am target shootingwithout pursuing a living animal.
Only the ethics of the given individual would put one in a situation where the line becomes cloudy. At that point it's not for me to judge, if, you are hunting be legal means.
#66
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
This topic will never die, to each their own. My own personal thoughts on the subject vary. Shooting and killing and animal are just one part of a hunt, scouting and trying to outsmart a worthy advisary is a great thrill and there is nothing quite like sitting in the stand and looking up and seeing a buck walking down the trail like i thought he would. That being said, the reason im out in the woods is to kill a deer, otherwise i wouldnt carry my bow, i would bring a camera. Bow hunting to me is about patience and perserverance. I could easily go out with a gun in my area in season and kill deer every day, but i like the challenge, but if im walking to my stand and on the way in i see a buck that i have scouted, im going to try to get him, no matter what the circumstances are. Success is when preparation meets opportunity and you have to jump on those chances. There are many different tactics that will work for deer. I personally cant understand how people will put in a 1-2 acre food plot and hunt over that, but yell at people and tell them that hunting over bait is noy hunting. In either circumstance you are adding a non native food that is changing the deers natural behavior. Is one right and one wrong? Who knows, but i dont think so. The same could be said about using calls and scents.
As for fences, i have mixed views on them. I feel if you are in an enclosure that hampers the movement of the animal to where it cant avoid you, that isnt hunting. If you in 1000s of acres that are just habitat, that is more of a challenge than hunting some of the neighborhoods that i hunt. Damn, some of the properties that i hunt the challenge is to not shoot and wait for the biggest ones. As long as the animal has a chance to evaid you and your having a good time, that is hunting.
As for fences, i have mixed views on them. I feel if you are in an enclosure that hampers the movement of the animal to where it cant avoid you, that isnt hunting. If you in 1000s of acres that are just habitat, that is more of a challenge than hunting some of the neighborhoods that i hunt. Damn, some of the properties that i hunt the challenge is to not shoot and wait for the biggest ones. As long as the animal has a chance to evaid you and your having a good time, that is hunting.
#67
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
And just who says that someone who prefers to hunt squirrels or other small game isn't just as dedicated to hunting as someone who climbs up a tree and freezes his gonads off trying to get a deer?
A little whitetail elitism coming to the surface, huh? LOL [8D]
A little whitetail elitism coming to the surface, huh? LOL [8D]
#69
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Judging by the common theme in most posts I would say that the deciding factor in most people's minds about the difference between "hunting" and "shooting" is the amount of challenge to the hunter involved.
Agreed?
Agreed?
#70
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: atlasman
Judging by the common theme in most posts I would say that the deciding factor in most people's minds about the difference between "hunting" and "shooting" is the amount of challenge to the hunter involved.
Agreed?
Judging by the common theme in most posts I would say that the deciding factor in most people's minds about the difference between "hunting" and "shooting" is the amount of challenge to the hunter involved.
Agreed?
So.. what.. I do my scouting and such and place my stand. Opening morning a 160 classbuck comes by, I shoot it, and in 3 minutes I'm done.
Not much effort..is the "hunt" then diminished to "shooting"? By your (or the concensus') opinion?