The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
#41
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Interesting...........are the guys on TV that make you sick "hunting" (in your opinion?) No IMO they are not. They are marketing. They arelazy soft handed sissys. Always after the easy target and making a fool of themselves after the kill. Just my opinion but I would enjoy loosening their grill.
#42
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: davidmil
Ya'll worry to much. It's suppose to be fun. If you're all worried about how the other guy does it... you really aren't having much fun.
Ya'll worry to much. It's suppose to be fun. If you're all worried about how the other guy does it... you really aren't having much fun.
#43
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: PreacherTony
Yes IMO .... Fair chase
ORIGINAL: atlasman
So..........is it the fence that makes it not "hunting"??
If so why?
ORIGINAL: goherd1111
If its not high fenced and the animal is taken legally and ethically its hunting! JMHO!!!!!
If its not high fenced and the animal is taken legally and ethically its hunting! JMHO!!!!!
If so why?
#45
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blossvale, New York
Posts: 21,199
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
What's the difference, he can't get out. Nor can he wander onto your neighbors place and get shot. He's caged no matter how you look at it or what size the cage. He becomes a pen raised animal at that point. And if you "Manage" him, and feed him and cull him... he becomes livestock, not the noble wild beast.
#46
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Posts: 6,679
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: BigJ12
Great post...I concur!
ORIGINAL: davidmil
Ya'll worry to much. It's suppose to be fun. If you're all worried about how the other guy does it... you really aren't having much fun.
Ya'll worry to much. It's suppose to be fun. If you're all worried about how the other guy does it... you really aren't having much fun.
#47
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Heaven is my home, temporarily residing in WNY :)
Posts: 6,679
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: springcaller
So what if it 500 to 1000 acres, thats free rangeing for a lot of deer, if they have everuthing they want in that area (Food, water, hot doe's) Thay have no use to go anywhere else) I have deer on 32 acres that will never go anywhere unless there shot, ut b/c they have eeverything they need and there is no point in going anywhere else. I guess what I'm saying is that it matters how big the fenced in area is.
ORIGINAL: PreacherTony
Yes IMO .... Fair chase
ORIGINAL: atlasman
So..........is it the fence that makes it not "hunting"??
If so why?
ORIGINAL: goherd1111
If its not high fenced and the animal is taken legally and ethically its hunting! JMHO!!!!!
If its not high fenced and the animal is taken legally and ethically its hunting! JMHO!!!!!
If so why?
#48
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Pretty easy for me!
Hunting = I am pursuing a game animal. With the intent of killing it, if opportunity presents itself.
Shooting = I am target shootingwithout pursuing a living animal.
Only the ethics of the given individual would put one in a situation where the line becomes cloudy. At that point it's not for me to judge, if, you are hunting be legal means.
Hunting = I am pursuing a game animal. With the intent of killing it, if opportunity presents itself.
Shooting = I am target shootingwithout pursuing a living animal.
Only the ethics of the given individual would put one in a situation where the line becomes cloudy. At that point it's not for me to judge, if, you are hunting be legal means.
#49
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
I'm pretty much in line with GR8atta2d. I once pulled into the parking lot of a Maryland wildlife management area and as I did there was a deer standing well within muzzleloader range. I was able to park my truck, get my gun and other gear while she watched me. I could have easily taken a shot (would not have been legal, but that's not the point) and probably killed her, but to me that would have been just taking a shot, not hunting.
As others have said, to me hunting is the total experience. Scouting, stand placement, hiking in with 30 pounds of gear, climbing the tree, braving the elements, being quiet and still and patient, hopefully getting a deer within range and then making the kill. But it does not stop there. It's gutting it, dragging it out, butchering it. Taking the shot is part of the hunt, but a very minor part. If I go to a buddies place to hunt and he hooks me up with a spot, I'm going to question him about the deer in the area, habbits, how the area lays out, etc., etc., gain as much information as I can before I go take the stand. IMO, this likens it to my own hunting preps that I'd take elsewhere.
As for high fences...this is a very interesting topic. I am stationed on a 1700+ acre Naval Air Station. We have lots of deer and some really nice ones at that. We also have an 8' high fence around the base for security reasons. So, if I hunt on this base, am I hunting high fence? Yeah, I guess so, but also not really. There are a couple of places where they can skirt around the end of the fence or swim across a water way to get somewhere else. They also CAN jump that fence if they want/need to (the mature ones anyway). I believe they choose to stay on base because it provides everything they need. A lot of the 1700 acres is heavily timbered and a lot is also leased to farmers for ag crops. They have food, shelter, water and great habitat so why would they want to leave...except when they are pressured by hunters and as I've already stated...they CAN get out.
Long post, but this is a very good topic. Thanks for bringing it up Atlas.
As others have said, to me hunting is the total experience. Scouting, stand placement, hiking in with 30 pounds of gear, climbing the tree, braving the elements, being quiet and still and patient, hopefully getting a deer within range and then making the kill. But it does not stop there. It's gutting it, dragging it out, butchering it. Taking the shot is part of the hunt, but a very minor part. If I go to a buddies place to hunt and he hooks me up with a spot, I'm going to question him about the deer in the area, habbits, how the area lays out, etc., etc., gain as much information as I can before I go take the stand. IMO, this likens it to my own hunting preps that I'd take elsewhere.
As for high fences...this is a very interesting topic. I am stationed on a 1700+ acre Naval Air Station. We have lots of deer and some really nice ones at that. We also have an 8' high fence around the base for security reasons. So, if I hunt on this base, am I hunting high fence? Yeah, I guess so, but also not really. There are a couple of places where they can skirt around the end of the fence or swim across a water way to get somewhere else. They also CAN jump that fence if they want/need to (the mature ones anyway). I believe they choose to stay on base because it provides everything they need. A lot of the 1700 acres is heavily timbered and a lot is also leased to farmers for ag crops. They have food, shelter, water and great habitat so why would they want to leave...except when they are pressured by hunters and as I've already stated...they CAN get out.
Long post, but this is a very good topic. Thanks for bringing it up Atlas.