The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
#141
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ND
Posts: 1,627
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: GMMAT
Tim:
Sorry.....I have NO IDEA what you're talking about. If you're talking about this (below).....it was written in response to a different thread where people were telling others to not clean up their kills for photos and to be proud of not siphoning out potentially abrasive images before sharing them with the general public. I think my follow up paragraph states my feelings on trapping JUST FINE.
Tim:
Sorry.....I have NO IDEA what you're talking about. If you're talking about this (below).....it was written in response to a different thread where people were telling others to not clean up their kills for photos and to be proud of not siphoning out potentially abrasive images before sharing them with the general public. I think my follow up paragraph states my feelings on trapping JUST FINE.
Heck NO! Trappers be proud!! You aren't doing anything illegal. Smear some blood on the animals and ride around town with your animals still in the traps....decorating your truck. Tell everyone that asks how it almost chewed its' own leg off before you got up to it and pierced its skull with your .22. Good SHOT!!
The aforementioned was stated in jest.....kind of. I won't get into my thoughts on trapping.....but will add that it's legal....and that trappers (the ones I know) are pretty careful in how they allow the public to see what they do. They do a good job of flying under the radar.....and we'd do well to follow their lead.
The aforementioned was stated in jest.....kind of. I won't get into my thoughts on trapping.....but will add that it's legal....and that trappers (the ones I know) are pretty careful in how they allow the public to see what they do. They do a good job of flying under the radar.....and we'd do well to follow their lead.
You want us not toread anything into your posts, yet youreply to a post in response toa differentpost which really had nothing to do with this post.... Well it did to you but not to me cause you gave not a hint. That makes perfect sense to me!! [&:]
An apology is in order but now I am really confused if it should be me, you or Elvis.
Seriously... Sorry if I offended you. I misunderstood yourreply.
Tim
#142
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: Germ
I could really careless how other people hunt
I could really careless how other people hunt
That means different things to different people. Read the thread. Many people feel that some activities require much less hunting skill and much more shooting skill to accomplish. That is nothing more then a personal opinion and everyone has one. I doubt anyone out there wouldconsider EVERY method of hunting equally challenging. We see it in here EVERY day.
What you are griping about is not even going on in this thread. The question was simple and the answer is simple as well.You are whining about something that isn't even going on.
He it is for the third time, please pay attention
If it is legal have at it
If it is legal have at it
Ok Atlas We know you like to stir pots. Man I hear you make a great chicken noodle soup
Yes, I do make greatchicken soup.......great this time of year!!!
#143
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Not stirring anything.........your comment was 100% hypocritical. You bust on other hunters all the time.......and then whine aboutother hunters doing the same (which no one even was).
do you gun hunt?.....
if not, why?
would you feel the same about two practically equal deer if one was killed with a bow and the other was killed by a rifle inside a small fenced area?
You go ahead and ask again for the fourth time
Do you make a good chili?
I have a serious question, what do you think of the guy NY Governor wants as head of DEC(Grannis SP?) I hear he tried to past an anti-hunting bill?
#144
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: Germ
Ok, what ever you say Atlas, you are too funny
Ok, what ever you say Atlas, you are too funny
It is a legal form of hunting here, I have the option
I really don't care, but I use too, but I had a great talk with a guy on AT. He set me straight and I was wrong. Worry about how othershunt is just not worth it. As long as they follow the theirgames laws.
Do you make a good chili?
I have a serious question, what do you think of the guy NY Governor wants as head of DEC(Grannis SP?) I hear he tried to past an anti-hunting bill?
#145
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
his, from the guy who sent me PM's of his deer because I wasn't around for a couple days and was afraid I missed it.
I seeyou accuse me of something. I ask who andanswer with nothing[:-].
Hey if you want to talk about special PM's Atlas I still have most of yours, they are gems If I recall I had an opps with my deer, I was just sharing Again you take things out of context, and give yourself to much credit
We know Atlas you never "bust" on anyone Your a model for HNI members
LAME...........Do you or not?
Why do you keep making this out to be about other people. This has nothing to do with worrying about others. I asked where the line is FOR YOU (and others). Your avoidance of the gun hunting question tells me that you are well aware of where the line is FOR YOU but don't want to discuss it for some reason.
I just follow the game laws and have fun I have many options in Michigan and Ohio to hunt with bow, crossbow(Oh), or gun. If I desire I can go to a fenced in ranch and pay, or an outfitter who is fair chase(charade I know).
As for Grannis I do not live in NY, but worried about waht happens their. I hear he is not a "friend" of the NY sportsman. I ask a NY sportsman who I know stays on top of thinks and would give a fair answer(you)
Ok I think we have had enough fun, now we are just wasting space on Justin server andbandwidth
Good thread, sorry I did not give the answers you wanted
#146
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Atlas....you're simply not being forthcoming.
You're lookingto bust on somebody in an underhanded way.....but you haven't found anyone that'll accept your lame premises, yet.
Keep fishing......there's one born every minute. Maybe he'll jump on your wagon.
You're lookingto bust on somebody in an underhanded way.....but you haven't found anyone that'll accept your lame premises, yet.
Keep fishing......there's one born every minute. Maybe he'll jump on your wagon.
#147
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,925
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Some interesting answers in here.I didnt read the last few pages though.
About two years ago I did some work for a guy on his house and had an interesting hunting area fall into my lap.His brother owned it, they dont deer hunt, just pheasant hunt it.Its a couple hundred acres probably and designed to hold pheasants, theyve got food plots, its all CPR ground for the most part, but its bordered on three sides by obstacles, theres a lake on the south side, a deep creek to the west and a highway to the north.Along the creek theres heavy willow thickets and cattails that the deer use as a bedding area.They only really have one direction to come out without swimming or dodging traffic.Its recieved no deer hunting pressure in years.Hanging a stand is a no brainer, theres one main trail running from the bedding area to the food plots and from the food plot over to the nieghboring property.At one point it forms a funnel about 30 yards across where the lake and creek parallel each other, they almost have to pass through it to get out.
It took me all of about 15 minutes to figure all this out, another 15 minutes to hang a stand and I have one of the best hunting set ups Ive ever run across.Since there was very little effort in finding the place, scouting it, hanging the stand, and its got features that limit the deers movement much like a fence, along with a foodplot I had nothing to do with should I feel guilty shooting a deer in there?Am I really hunting?Are the beavers in the creek likely to eat the tree my stands in?These are all questions that keep me up nights.
About two years ago I did some work for a guy on his house and had an interesting hunting area fall into my lap.His brother owned it, they dont deer hunt, just pheasant hunt it.Its a couple hundred acres probably and designed to hold pheasants, theyve got food plots, its all CPR ground for the most part, but its bordered on three sides by obstacles, theres a lake on the south side, a deep creek to the west and a highway to the north.Along the creek theres heavy willow thickets and cattails that the deer use as a bedding area.They only really have one direction to come out without swimming or dodging traffic.Its recieved no deer hunting pressure in years.Hanging a stand is a no brainer, theres one main trail running from the bedding area to the food plots and from the food plot over to the nieghboring property.At one point it forms a funnel about 30 yards across where the lake and creek parallel each other, they almost have to pass through it to get out.
It took me all of about 15 minutes to figure all this out, another 15 minutes to hang a stand and I have one of the best hunting set ups Ive ever run across.Since there was very little effort in finding the place, scouting it, hanging the stand, and its got features that limit the deers movement much like a fence, along with a foodplot I had nothing to do with should I feel guilty shooting a deer in there?Am I really hunting?Are the beavers in the creek likely to eat the tree my stands in?These are all questions that keep me up nights.
#148
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
Dang petasux.....
I'm troubled by your plight. I think you should introduce some coyotes/bobcats and similar other predators to this area. I think you should have the parcels picked up from God's Earth and moved 20 miles back into the wilderness (with no roads). I think you should go in there and run 3/4 of the deer out....to make the numbers smaller. I think you should kill the food plots. I think you should........
Who gives a rat's butt what anyone else thinks? Are we trying to make this as hard as possible?......OR....are we trying to kill deer?
Sounds to me like you found a great spot to hunt!
I'm troubled by your plight. I think you should introduce some coyotes/bobcats and similar other predators to this area. I think you should have the parcels picked up from God's Earth and moved 20 miles back into the wilderness (with no roads). I think you should go in there and run 3/4 of the deer out....to make the numbers smaller. I think you should kill the food plots. I think you should........
Who gives a rat's butt what anyone else thinks? Are we trying to make this as hard as possible?......OR....are we trying to kill deer?
Sounds to me like you found a great spot to hunt!
#150
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: The subjective nature of what is considered "hunting" vs "shooting"
ORIGINAL: Germ
I see you only qoute part of what I wrote
I see you only qoute part of what I wrote
I see you see you accuse me of something. I ask who, andanswer with nothing[:-].
Hey if you want to talk about special PM's Atlas I still have most of yours, they are gems
We know Atlas you never "bust" on anyone Your a model for HNI members
Sure Atlas, but your threads(as normal)are about everyone. So where I draw the line has a direct bearing of how I think of others.
What does it matter if I gun hunt or not?
If I choose not to gun hunt, does that mean I think it is "shooting" now?