Community
Bowhunting Talk about the passion that is bowhunting. Share in the stories, pictures, tips, tactics and learn how to be a better bowhunter.

scientific test, or scientific marketing... you decide...

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-22-2007, 10:09 AM
  #11  
Nontypical Buck
 
NEW61375's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southeast, VA
Posts: 2,119
Default RE: scientific test, or scientific marketing... you decide...

ORIGINAL: Canuck_2

All other concerns aside, this procedure does NOT follow acceptable scientific study procedures. The article simply appears to be a poorly disguised advertisement for Grim Reaper and numerous assumptions & poorly thought-out claims are made. I equate this type of advertising to the propaganda animal rights fanatics spread to gain converts.

When a scientific experiment is undertaken, it is not to prove thatyour belief in something is irrefutable. Rather, it is to test whether outcomes either support or do not support your original hypothesis. All variables must be tightly controlled and experimental procedures must be accurately measureable.

I actually saw this article a few days ago and just shook my head. Grim Reapers lost my respect immediately, regardless of whether they have a good product or not.
Although definitely not scientific study, I found the tests interesting. This link is from the HuntingNet home page:

Broadhead Myth Busters: Part 1

It shows them putting bone in some of the gelatin blocks but I am not sure of the results they got.

I look at it like an infomercial. But I can say this, I have field tested the Grim Reaper Razor Cut Broadheads and they were completely devastating on the deer I shot. I had ashot where I was kind ofshootingdown on the deer and hit the deer directly between the shoulder blades where the shoulder blades and spine come together(I know not a recommended shot, I kind of panicked) and the broadhead broke the spine and penetrated into the chest a little. The broadhead held up great and the shot was devastating to say the least. Although not a shot I really want to try again I was very pleased the durability and damage from this broadhead.
NEW61375 is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 11:38 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,032
Default RE: scientific test, or scientific marketing... you decide...

I think that it is a myth. I would never believe what anyone says about broadheads until i try them my self.
killzonearchery is offline  
Old 01-22-2007, 12:16 PM
  #13  
Boone & Crockett
 
bigbulls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,679
Default RE: scientific test, or scientific marketing... you decide...

If ballistics gel were designed to test broadheads instead of bullet upset and permanent woundsurrounding the bullets path this "scientific study" may proove to be valid.






bigbulls is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bassdeer
Video & Photography
1
10-26-2007 11:37 AM
LittleChief
Bowhunting
42
04-17-2007 09:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: scientific test, or scientific marketing... you decide...


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.