Scent containment carbon clothing question continued
#51
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Apology
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
Yes, its an open forum but YOU are the one who takes peoples quotes and makes personal attacks.
Yes, its an open forum but YOU are the one who takes peoples quotes and makes personal attacks.
I don't think I'm the one thats "stupid". You are misleading.
You may have bought a carbon water filter but I believe you have bought and used said product about as much as I believe your hunting "stories".
I didn't get into the technical aspect as I believe that could be argued over and over without any definite proof either way.
What I said and will continue to say, as well as the great majority of the people who've REALLY bought and used it, is that is performed great for me. It did everything I wanted from it.
People ask how others like the product and we tell them. That seems to be a problem with you in particular.
Why don't you concentrate on figuring out the difference between a doe and a buck
before you spend so much time on here trying to dissuade people from trying out things you only think you know about.
I've never seen one iota of positive help in any of your posts.
Once again, great product and would recommend it to anyone.
#52
RE: Apology
You're pathetic. Simple question - yes or no. Have you ever used Scentlok or Scentblocker. I already know you won't answer because you've never owned one. Where in any of my posts did I say I credited every deer I saw to the clothing I had on. You are the one slinging the condescending posts and putting words in that weren't said. Once again, as usual you show your non-integrity. How old are you? Give it a rest. I said I was completely satisfied with the product, same as the great majority that own them. You want to slam them. Feel free but why don't you try doing it without the quotes and insulting others. I should have put you on block a long time ago. No time like the present.
#53
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Apology
ORIGINAL: aeroslinger
You're pathetic. Simple question - yes or no. Have you ever used Scentlok or Scentblocker.
You're pathetic. Simple question - yes or no. Have you ever used Scentlok or Scentblocker.
Simple question for you..........what is your educational and experience level with activated carbon?
I already know you won't answer
Once again, as usual you show your non-integrity.
I said I was completely satisfied with the product, same as the great majority that own them.
I'm sure it's no coincidence that the people who always get upset when the truth comes out about these suits are the ones who spent their money and took the bait without knowing the real truth. Like I said........the truth is the truth. I can't help it if it makes some people feel stupid.........think about all the people it will help avoid that feeling.
You want to slam them. Feel free but why don't you try doing it without the quotes and insulting others.
I should have put you on block a long time ago. No time like the present.
Don't forget your ball.
#54
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: Apology
Here is a little "heads up" for all the people out there who may be interested in such things.
In the 2006 Peterson's BOWHUNTING issue Greg Sesselmann (President and Founder of Scent-Lok is quoted as saying "We're not married to activated charcoal"............this seems to be awfully coincindental with the information that was included in Mr Michels article about patents running out and the increasing scrutiny of these products lately IMO.
If I was to make a prediction as to what the future holds for these suit makers I would say that in the NEAR future you will see them all move away from carbon and onto something they tout as being the next greatest thing............this way everyone forgets about carbon and fresh new patents can start all over again.........win-win situation........for them.
The article also states that in an attempt to disprove the negative comments about his product HE HIRED a firm to test his product. This is pretty much the worst bias to introduce.........big surprise when the company paying the bill gets favorable results...........that would be the equivalent of Pfizer paying for a study on Lipitor or Norvasc and the results being very favorable...........what a shock []
Interesting..........it's also interesting that he "discovered" the idea for scent-lok when working with it as a filter media for dry cleaning fluids.............something our very own Davidmil is very familiar with also if I remember correctly. Weird how some guys here dismiss David's thoughts as meaningless.......but put complete faith in a product spawned from that very same experience.
Weird.
In the 2006 Peterson's BOWHUNTING issue Greg Sesselmann (President and Founder of Scent-Lok is quoted as saying "We're not married to activated charcoal"............this seems to be awfully coincindental with the information that was included in Mr Michels article about patents running out and the increasing scrutiny of these products lately IMO.
If I was to make a prediction as to what the future holds for these suit makers I would say that in the NEAR future you will see them all move away from carbon and onto something they tout as being the next greatest thing............this way everyone forgets about carbon and fresh new patents can start all over again.........win-win situation........for them.
The article also states that in an attempt to disprove the negative comments about his product HE HIRED a firm to test his product. This is pretty much the worst bias to introduce.........big surprise when the company paying the bill gets favorable results...........that would be the equivalent of Pfizer paying for a study on Lipitor or Norvasc and the results being very favorable...........what a shock []
Interesting..........it's also interesting that he "discovered" the idea for scent-lok when working with it as a filter media for dry cleaning fluids.............something our very own Davidmil is very familiar with also if I remember correctly. Weird how some guys here dismiss David's thoughts as meaningless.......but put complete faith in a product spawned from that very same experience.
Weird.
#56
RE: Apology
Yes........I have used the active ingredient in those products for many years. I have studied it's uses and limitations and witnessed them first hand in lab studies and procedures. Activated carbon does not change from product to product (except maybe surface area).
I'm sure it's no coincidence that the people who always get upset when the truth comes out about these suits are the ones who spent their money and took the bait without knowing the real truth. Like I said........the truth is the truth. I can't help it if it makes some people feel stupid.........think about all the people it will help avoid that feeling.
Don't forget your ball.
Love my scent clothes and will buy again. Highly recommend.