Bowtech pics anyone?? Here they are!!
#11
RE: Bowtech pics anyone?? Here they are!!
my computer froze up when he realized that I spent more than 7 seconds on a bow page that wasn't www.hoytusa.com.
thanks for the pics.
thanks for the pics.
#12
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Goose Creek SC
Posts: 1,097
RE: Bowtech pics anyone?? Here they are!!
I have an '06 60#@28.5" Tomkat on order. I shot an '05 Tomkat in The Archery Shop and was tremendously pleased with it. I decided to order an '06 when I heard about the addition of dual cams with modules to the Tomkat. I was pleasantly surprised when I read about the '06 Tomkat this morning and saw that they have also added the VFT technology to it, as well.
Bill
Praise the Lord, He is Worthy!
Bill
Praise the Lord, He is Worthy!
#14
RE: Bowtech pics anyone?? Here they are!!
They don't do nothing for me.....Like most manufactures, the ultra long risers and short, parallellimbs are what's "in". To me they look less like a bow and more like some wheeled contraption.
On the other hand I hear they shoot great. I think I need to shoot one,maybe then I can look past just how darn ugly they are. When I look at one of these new style bows (not just bowtech) the last thing I think of is....."it looks like a bow".
Maybe I'm just showing my age but I think a bow (compound or not) should at the very least LOOK like a bow. I guess I should get used to it, I don't think it will change any time soon.
On the other hand I hear they shoot great. I think I need to shoot one,maybe then I can look past just how darn ugly they are. When I look at one of these new style bows (not just bowtech) the last thing I think of is....."it looks like a bow".
Maybe I'm just showing my age but I think a bow (compound or not) should at the very least LOOK like a bow. I guess I should get used to it, I don't think it will change any time soon.
#15
RE: Bowtech pics anyone?? Here they are!!
On the other hand I hear they shoot great.
#16
RE: Bowtech pics anyone?? Here they are!!
ORIGINAL: MQ1shooter
I know what you mean about the traditional "look" -- but, if you think about it, the design makes total sense: the ends of the limbs moving perfectly up and down to carry the energy not transferred into the arrow away from the shooter. There is none left to "jump" forward upon release.
On the other hand I hear they shoot great.
I also realize that I'm in the minority when it comes to what people think is a good looking bow, which in turn makes me S.O.L.