Is this what we are heading towards?
#23
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
datamax, as far as I'm concerned, there is no point in saying it's gone beyond what archery is supposed to be. If I've learned one thing over the past 15-or-so years, it's this... Seems that the vast majority of latter day bowhunters and archers refuse to consider any kind of limitiations to compound technology. Witness the furor over P&Y's late 65% rule. No letoff limitations. (Of course, this bow would not be P&Y legal because of it's length. They didn't change that rule when they dropped the 65% rule.)
If anyone were to say this bow has gone beyond where archery should be, all it would accomplish is having a bunch of yayhoos up in arms calling that person an anti-compound terrorist.
Been there. Done that. Got the T-shirt.
I still think the crossbow is the logical end product in the direction compound technology is headed. This is just another step in that direction. This thing is practically a crossbow riser with a pistol grip mounted on it.
If anyone were to say this bow has gone beyond where archery should be, all it would accomplish is having a bunch of yayhoos up in arms calling that person an anti-compound terrorist.
Been there. Done that. Got the T-shirt.
I still think the crossbow is the logical end product in the direction compound technology is headed. This is just another step in that direction. This thing is practically a crossbow riser with a pistol grip mounted on it.
#25
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 2,413
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
I don't worry about anyone "pushing the limit". It's simply the result of a competitve market in a free society. The U.S. is great in this way. It gives people the incentive to think of new and innovative ways of doing things. If it works, then there will be a percentage of hunters who will buy it. If there's a problem then the company will go the way of the dinosaur. I don't know why it would bother anyone if someone else uses it. It's only obvious advantage is size. Everything else would limit the archers ability to take animals, from what I can see.
#26
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,329
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
I would definetly want to take her for a spin. I think it would be an advantage for hunting in that you have less to carry and the animal has less to see.
What is the price?
Tom
What is the price?
Tom
#27
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Memphis TN USA
Posts: 3,445
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
I still think the crossbow is the logical end product in the direction compound technology is headed. This is just another step in that direction. This thing is practically a crossbow riser with a pistol grip mounted on it.
#28
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
I for one, kind of like the looks of it. I wouldn't mind having one to shoot. Prolly wouldn't use it for hunting, but it would be fun to shoot.
Could you imagine how far your arrows would stick past the cams when you have a quiver on?
Could you imagine how far your arrows would stick past the cams when you have a quiver on?
#29
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 2,678
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
I don't worry about anyone "pushing the limit". It's simply the result of a competitve market in a free society. The U.S. is great in this way. It gives people the incentive to think of new and innovative ways of doing things. If it works, then there will be a percentage of hunters who will buy it. If there's a problem then the company will go the way of the dinosaur. I don't know why it would bother anyone if someone else uses it. It's only obvious advantage is size. Everything else would limit the archers ability to take animals, from what I can see.
This new bow, we'll call it the Stealthy-Bow, retails for $175 all decked out. Its gauranteed for life. Stealthy-Bow is gauranteed to increase your shooting accuracy, distance and will gaurantee you more success in the field.
Hell of a deal huh ? But is that REALLY archery ? Archery should be more that just how accurate you can be, or how fast your arrows go or how many deer you can tag in a season. I think Arthur P understands that, DoubleCreek does ........ the rest of ya'll ? I dunno ................
#30
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
RE: Is this what we are heading towards?
Why do you guys care? No one is going to force you to shoot something like that so why is it so important that everyone else should have to do it exactly like you do?
We used to look at all new products with one thought: Is it good for archery and bowhunting? Now there are guys like you who's first question is: Why do you guys care?
I pity you, SA, because you will never get to experience the kind of bowhunting that I once knew. Of course, you won't understand and think I'm being a smart@$$, but I'm actually being sincere. Remember that I was 16 years old and already a veteran bowhunter by the time the compound bow was even invented.
There are others here who are in my age group. Just ask them about those days. I'm sure they also remember the days when someone actually had to accomplish something before he could feel proud of himself.