Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
#11
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,092
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
It's good to see others that appreciate the merits of weighed charges. Combine pre-weighed charges with the tubes (such as THESE being sold near cost by one of the HA members) and you are on the road to better groups at the range.
It's sort of funny to me how well this has all caught on when there was so much rejection of the idea originally. It works.
It's sort of funny to me how well this has all caught on when there was so much rejection of the idea originally. It works.
#12
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
Actually you shouldn't weigh black powder or it's replacements like pyrodex, clean shot, or 777. You should measure them by volume, not weight, it's more accurate. The weight of these powders can change with temprature and humidity. Measure 100 grns by volume and then put it on a scale, I bet it's not the same. And if you work up a load during the summer, then weigh out some charges in the winter you may get some different loads. Unless you pre weigh them in a controlled inviornment. At any rate you should check the volume weight to the measured weight to make sure they are close. This would keep you from having an accidental over charge.
smokeless powder is not the same, it can be measured by weight.
Paul
smokeless powder is not the same, it can be measured by weight.
Paul
#13
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
...plus...the real point of muzzleloading is the experience of a more primitve form of firearms and hunting like the early generations of settlers did...and many times they didn't have or bother with powder measures, choosing instead to use old fashioned ways of measuring powder like "covering a ball with powder in the palm of the hand", etc...crude but obviously effective...they settled the country
#14
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
That's not why I use a muzzloader, but if you do that's cool. I use one to extend my season, and where I live we can't use centerfire rifles. It's shotguns and ML's, and in my opinion a properly loaded inline ML is better than most slug guns. Although with some of the new ammo they are catching up. I use my ML during regular gun season. I try to hunt as effedtively as I can, not make it harder than it needs to be.
To each his own I guess, as long as you are enjoying yourself, that's the important part.
Paul
To each his own I guess, as long as you are enjoying yourself, that's the important part.
Paul
#15
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 714
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
ORIGINAL: Paul L Mohr
Actually you shouldn't weigh black powder or it's replacements like pyrodex, clean shot, or 777. You should measure them by volume, not weight, it's more accurate. The weight of these powders can change with temprature and humidity.
Actually you shouldn't weigh black powder or it's replacements like pyrodex, clean shot, or 777. You should measure them by volume, not weight, it's more accurate. The weight of these powders can change with temprature and humidity.
Measure 100 grns by volume and then put it on a scale, I bet it's not the same.
And if you work up a load during the summer, then weigh out some charges in the winter you may get some different loads. Unless you pre weigh them in a controlled inviornment. At any rate you should check the volume weight to the measured weight to make sure they are close. This would keep you from having an accidental over charge.
smokeless powder is not the same, it can be measured by weight.
#16
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Blissfield MI USA
Posts: 5,293
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
but you are doing what I suggested and know that they are different. I don't want someone to read this and think they can do it by weight alone. Like read something that says use 130 or 150 grn charge, then they measure it out on a scale instead of a volume measurer. That's an accident waiting to happen.
I've tried it both ways and didn't see a difference, it was just a pain in the butt pretty much. My remington will shoot one inch or better groups at 100 yards going by volume, so it works pretty well for me.
All of the manufactures of powder state to use volume, not weight by the way, because of the differences.
Paul
I've tried it both ways and didn't see a difference, it was just a pain in the butt pretty much. My remington will shoot one inch or better groups at 100 yards going by volume, so it works pretty well for me.
All of the manufactures of powder state to use volume, not weight by the way, because of the differences.
Paul
#17
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 714
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
Whenever I list a load, I give the specs. If I'm shooting an 80 gr. load by weight I say that and add that it equals 100 gr by volume. Or I simply give the volume measurement. I do know that weighed charges is not for beginners which is why I am specific when I post such data.
For example:
Today I took my wife shooting with her Wolverine. Her load was a 295 gr powerbelt and 57 gr of 777 ffg (weight) which equals 70 gr by volume. She shot a couple decent inch groups at 50 yds with her open sights (this actually happened this morning).
For example:
Today I took my wife shooting with her Wolverine. Her load was a 295 gr powerbelt and 57 gr of 777 ffg (weight) which equals 70 gr by volume. She shot a couple decent inch groups at 50 yds with her open sights (this actually happened this morning).
#18
RE: Most Accurate Powder Measurer ?
This three-shot group was fired at 100 yards on 3 SEPT 04 using home-cast 230-grain .45 caliber Maxiballs (TC mould) and 90 grains "striken measure" 777 FFg powder. Win. 209 primer in a Wm. Large-barreled Hawken rifle, 1/72" round-ball twist, with a Wonderwad under the bullet. The old-time Schuetzen and bench-rest ML rifle shooters used powder measures, despite the fact that many of them owned or had access to, precision laboratory balances. Many of the groups they shot have yet to be equalled by any BP rifle in modern times. Just take a look at Ned Roberts' book, THE MUZZLELOADIONG CAPLOCK RIFLE!!