PA going back to patch and ball?
#1
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Audubon & Red Rock, Penna.
Posts: 4,472
PA going back to patch and ball?
I heard that PA is going to outlaw conical and other black powder projectiles and allow only patch and round balls for muzzle loader season. Is this true? This was the case a couple of years ago.
Scott Meier
White Oak Lodge
Scott Meier
White Oak Lodge
#2
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Delco PA USA
Posts: 15
RE: PA going back to patch and ball?
I have heard that as well.
My personal opinion is that they should. We are fortunate enough to have a state that maintains a muzzleloading season as it should be....flintlock, open sights...and tradtionally was roundball for many years.
A roundball is plenty accurate and deadly for pennsylvania game. Let's keep the season historically correct and tradtional. Inlines are fine for states that don't allow high powered rifles......but keep them out of our muzzleloading season. Going back to roundball only will help maintain a great tradition.
My personal opinion is that they should. We are fortunate enough to have a state that maintains a muzzleloading season as it should be....flintlock, open sights...and tradtionally was roundball for many years.
A roundball is plenty accurate and deadly for pennsylvania game. Let's keep the season historically correct and tradtional. Inlines are fine for states that don't allow high powered rifles......but keep them out of our muzzleloading season. Going back to roundball only will help maintain a great tradition.
#5
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oakland OR USA
Posts: 2,929
RE: PA going back to patch and ball?
Patch and ball or conical with the lenghth not to exceed twice the diameter is the way it is in oregon,loose powder and no centerfire primers .Iron or peep sights only . they call it primitive.
#7
RE: PA going back to patch and ball?
A .50 or larger round ball seems plenty for whitetail out to around 100 yards, but when using them I force myself to take only broadside shots, because of a lack of confidence in the ball's penetrating power. Am I wrong about this??
Larry
Larry
#8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
Posts: 315
RE: PA going back to patch and ball?
I believe that we(the hunters) only support the anti's arguments when we demand and purchase more modern muzzleloaders.I do not care whether it is a in-line or side lock design..as this really does not have that much influence on ballistics(tests conducted on both types produce identical results),I also believe that using conicals/sabots is conductive to a clean harvest of our quarry.What I would prefer to see is less scopes,Discs,sealed breaches, magnum centrefire primers and perhaps most of all,NO smokeless powder!Muzzleloaders are a primitive weapon and should stay that way .Just my opinion though.......
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sharp Shooter
Black Powder
4
07-24-2006 12:13 PM