Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Let's Talk Loads

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-10-2011, 11:39 AM
  #11  
Giant Nontypical
 
Muley Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 9,557
Default

I agree that faster is not always the answer with a PRB. Getting close is more important, or if you must. Bigger ball.

They are a bit better than a PB though. They don't explode. At least pure lead doesn't. Not sure about those wheel weight balls.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:55 AM
  #12  
Nontypical Buck
 
HuntAway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Renfrew County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,392
Default

Ok so I'm confused. Which is it 80 or 160 gr?

"
Flintlocks
Always use Black Powder in the priming pan and for main charge in a flintlock. Use FFFFg priming powder in the pan for fastest flash and use FFFg or FFg for the main charge for best results. My prototype Manton style half stock flintlock rifle in 54 caliber, with 1-66 twist, loaded with a .530 caliber 220 grain round ball and .025 canvas patch, digests 80 gr FFFg Black powder superbly and fires as quickly as any percussion rifle.. This makes a terrific target load for the Rendezvous circuit as well as for round ball, flintlock hunting..

For hunting animals up to elk size, 160 grains FFg Black Powder is accurate with the same ball and patch and is a potent load at short range, up to 100 yards. Ignition with FFFFg in the pan of the Egg lock on the rifle is virtually instantaneous. It’s quick enough that an experienced shooter can unfailingly call his shots."

I understand the principles of roundballs but there seem's to be conflicting information out there.

On one hand we have 60gr good to 100-125 yds and on the other 160gr up to 100 yds. Huge variations here. I'm not doubting anyone just a little confused is all. Even White seems to contradict himself above saying 80 gr is fine then saying 160 is fine???

I think I'll stick with my 80-100gr loads.

HA
HuntAway is offline  
Old 10-10-2011, 12:37 PM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
Default

I didn't see where anyone on here mentioned 160grs of powder...

I mentioned 120grs of FF Goex, but that's not safe for some rifles...I have actually
shot 150grs of FF safely, but I am shooting a custom made rifle with a barrel that
is a 1 1/16 thick at the breach...

I typically use FFF powder for both the main charge and the prime...
nchawkeye is offline  
Old 10-10-2011, 12:56 PM
  #14  
Nontypical Buck
 
HuntAway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Renfrew County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,392
Default

Originally Posted by nchawkeye
I didn't see where anyone on here mentioned 160grs of powder...

I mentioned 120grs of FF Goex, but that's not safe for some rifles...I have actually
shot 150grs of FF safely, but I am shooting a custom made rifle with a barrel that
is a 1 1/16 thick at the breach...

I typically use FFF powder for both the main charge and the prime...
Sorry not you. It was a quote from Doc White that was talking about 160 gr.

as you had mentioned earlier about soft lead and powerbelts I 'd imagine 160gr at close range might very well pancake on impact???

HA
HuntAway is offline  
Old 10-10-2011, 01:39 PM
  #15  
Giant Nontypical
 
Muley Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 9,557
Default

120gr of BH 209 (not uncommon) is not far from 160gr of 2F BP.

Considering you're going to blow 30gr on BP out the barrel unburned.
Muley Hunter is offline  
Old 10-10-2011, 03:33 PM
  #16  
Nontypical Buck
 
HuntAway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Renfrew County, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,392
Default

Originally Posted by Muley Hunter
120gr of BH 209 (not uncommon) is not far from 160gr of 2F BP.

Considering you're going to blow 30gr on BP out the barrel unburned.

Oh I don't any intention's of trying that load. My Lyman is rated to a max load well below 160 gr.

HA
HuntAway is offline  
Old 10-10-2011, 03:50 PM
  #17  
Giant Nontypical
 
Muley Hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 9,557
Default

Mine too. The recoil would be ugly anyway. Which is why I hate big conicals with any load of powder.
Muley Hunter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.