I need a huge favor please.
09-19-2011, 11:15 AM
#51
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 550
if it is not about the perceived meaning of what you said.... What else could it be about??
Still just going to agrue the semantics of the wording... So, this thread is just useless BS... once again, for grouse to draw attention to himself and Knight!!!
you know the whole,, there is no bad advertising, keep people talking... i dont know about how great anything knight makes is, but green mountain makes a great barrel and who ever makes their stocks they are nice as well .... that easton ramrod looks nice... the lehigh bolt is nice... Wait a minute what is it that knight makes??? maybe the stock??? they are into plastics, right????
Still just going to agrue the semantics of the wording... So, this thread is just useless BS... once again, for grouse to draw attention to himself and Knight!!!
you know the whole,, there is no bad advertising, keep people talking... i dont know about how great anything knight makes is, but green mountain makes a great barrel and who ever makes their stocks they are nice as well .... that easton ramrod looks nice... the lehigh bolt is nice... Wait a minute what is it that knight makes??? maybe the stock??? they are into plastics, right????
Last edited by EndeavorShooter; 09-19-2011 at 11:30 AM.
09-19-2011, 11:37 AM
#52
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Staunton,Va
Posts: 3,713
how about an neutral point of view on this. I did not read it the first time. just read it. here is my take
that part of the statement could of be left out.
better then anything you own.
that is my take on all this. would of I picked up on what he was meaning if I read it when it was first posted. yes
Nobody could ever argue that but they will.
The Mountaineer is for real, and no production ML that I ever used matches the quality and accuracy to date. The T/C Triumph and the Knight Disc Elite used to be my favorite two Muzzleloaders.
that is my take on all this. would of I picked up on what he was meaning if I read it when it was first posted. yes
09-19-2011, 11:44 AM
#53
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,482
09-19-2011, 12:01 PM
#55
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Yucca Valley,Ca
Posts: 2,496
09-19-2011, 01:06 PM
#57
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Saxonburg Pa
Posts: 3,925
how about an neutral point of view on this. I did not read it the first time. just read it. here is my take
that part of the statement could of be left out.
better then anything you own.
that is my take on all this. would of I picked up on what he was meaning if I read it when it was first posted. yes
that part of the statement could of be left out.
better then anything you own.
that is my take on all this. would of I picked up on what he was meaning if I read it when it was first posted. yes
09-19-2011, 01:10 PM
#58
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 550
yep pretty simple.... the line no one could ever agrue that but they will, refering to pluckits post..... is the agrument not the remainder of the statement... cant just disregard that portion to change the meaning of his claim, now!!!
BUT HE WILL!!!!
BUT HE WILL!!!!
