Harvester 260g PT Gold
#22
And at a 100 that will be down to around 1400 fps... and certainly for a lot of elk that would work, but then if you happened to pull down on a big bull in rut, and with one shot... it would still work - eventually.
With a good bullet I support your thoughts to 75 yards with out much of a question after that unless you limit yourself to younger animals I would question it somewhat.
#23
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Rapid City, South Dakota
Posts: 3,732
I was just talking to Terry last night about that. I wanted to use the lighter recoiling, flatter shooting 250 gr, but i'd have to force down a .502 to do it. Terry didn't recommend that, but did agree that the 250 gr is plenty for elk.
So, i'd use the 250gr if I could.
I do keep my range to 125 yds. So, I have plenty of fpe with either bullet.
I know you're from the big bullet school Ron. I might be too if I was younger, but my bum shoulder limits me to reasonable recoil.
So, i'd use the 250gr if I could.
I do keep my range to 125 yds. So, I have plenty of fpe with either bullet.
I know you're from the big bullet school Ron. I might be too if I was younger, but my bum shoulder limits me to reasonable recoil.
After seeing how the 6mm killed elk, i went back to the 7mm, and in the field, one could see the elk go to their demise quicker. It was obvious the 7mm was a better elk rifle than the 6mm. I think the kids at school made fun of our son, using such a puny rifle to hunt elk, because he more or less took my 7mm away from me, and made me hunt with the 6mm. I ended up getting a .280 which also killed elk. Then i dreamed up what i thought would be my 'ultimate' elk rifle for hunting in the conditions where we hunted. That rifle was a 358 Winchester made from a Ruger ultra-light. It was made with a 19" barrel, and was great to carry. From that rifle 225g Nosler Partition bullets made a strong impression on elk, and made several take a permanent nap.
Meanwhile, our son also began to play around with different rifles for hunting elk. He went from the 7mm to a 30-30 to a 458 Winchester, to a 338 Weatherby to a 350 Remington. He gave up on them big rifle, because the recoil was brutal. His 350 is one of them short, small, light Remingtons that look like a toy. For that rifle, i load him 225g partitions, and we both have learned that them 35 caliber 225g partitions hurt elk really bad. It seems to us, that a bigger diameter bullet does better than smaller diameter bullet.
Then the kid decides he had to go to Alaska, and hunt Grizzly. So, i loaded him up some 250g partition, and he used that load and rifle to satisfy his 'needs'.
When the 'boys' were younger, i benefited from their energy, and youth, whenever i had an elk down. After life took its toll on their bodies, i kinda don't hunt as hard, and 'killing' elk isn't so very important anymore. Then wife moved back to Rapid City, so i had to follow. I sold most of my rifles, including my elk hunting 'baby'. The last elk i killed, was with my 'swede', using 125g partition.
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind, but what, that 250g Thor will whomp elk.
#24
Or any elk that you might encounter?
And at a 100 that will be down to around 1400 fps... and certainly for a lot of elk that would work, but then if you happened to pull down on a big bull in rut, and with one shot... it would still work - eventually.
With a good bullet I support your thoughts to 75 yards with out much of a question after that unless you limit yourself to younger animals I would question it somewhat.
And at a 100 that will be down to around 1400 fps... and certainly for a lot of elk that would work, but then if you happened to pull down on a big bull in rut, and with one shot... it would still work - eventually.
With a good bullet I support your thoughts to 75 yards with out much of a question after that unless you limit yourself to younger animals I would question it somewhat.
The 250gr Thor will knock an elk on it's ass.
I'm going to make you feel better, because you seemed to have forgot what I hunt for. I'm a meat hunter. I hunt alone. I can't eat antlers. It sucks dressing an elk after it's been in a wallow. Bulls are too big for me to haul out.
I hunt for cow elk. Easier to haul out from the back country. Taste better. Smells better. (they're ladies) There's more of them. I use a 300gr Thor.
I can't believe you don't think 1400lbs is enough to kill an elk? It's not a water buffalo.
#25
In your opinion do the 260 grain PT Gold like to be pushed hard. I shot some of them a while back and was amazed at how well they shot. I really liked them. Enough so that they are on my next order list.
#26
Fork Horn
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Burlington,Vt
Posts: 173
I have shot the 260gr PT Gold with 80gr of BH209 and achieved great accuracy with them. 1" or less at 100 yds. I have also pushed them with 120gr of Bh209 and got about the same accuracy. I have settled on 110gr of BH209 with CR sabot fired by a Fiocchi 616 209 primer in my Accura V1. Works great for me. I do not believe pushing them hard makes much difference at all. They are simply a good accurate bullet.
#28
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Yucca Valley,Ca
Posts: 2,496
Holy jumping jimimey! We agree on something
Not neccessarily a 'poor choice' but the fact that more importantly there are better choices available.
I have often thought and still do think if I were hunting with a Nosler .451-260 grain Partition, that was the bullet that I used for deer hunting and I ran into an elk what would I do?
I made this decision, if the animal was under a 100 and offered the 'good shot' i would go ahead and make the shot. I have a lot of confidence in the ability of the Nosler, Barnes, and Lehigh to penetrate and with the energy that bullet would have i felt comfortable with that decision.
Of course a head shot moots the whole point... shoot the Native Americans in Alaska use 22's but I admit they are better than I...
Not neccessarily a 'poor choice' but the fact that more importantly there are better choices available.
I have often thought and still do think if I were hunting with a Nosler .451-260 grain Partition, that was the bullet that I used for deer hunting and I ran into an elk what would I do?
I made this decision, if the animal was under a 100 and offered the 'good shot' i would go ahead and make the shot. I have a lot of confidence in the ability of the Nosler, Barnes, and Lehigh to penetrate and with the energy that bullet would have i felt comfortable with that decision.
Of course a head shot moots the whole point... shoot the Native Americans in Alaska use 22's but I admit they are better than I...
#29
Mike we agree on a lot lol.distance never had anything to do with a heavier bullet choice when it came to elk with me. be it M/L or centerfire. even cow elk have a lot more body mass than deer. it's all about quick and humane kills and a heavier bullet goes a long ways to assure just that happens.bullet drop between a .250 and .300 and recoil, don't come into play either.. i have seen my share of dead rotting elk in the woods in utah during a special rifle season they conducted every year while we were up bow hunting deer. it sickened me to find these elk, which we smelled first while stalking deer through the woods. Ray
#30
From that time on I always professed that the bullet needs to cause enough internal shock and trama to devastate the animimal on the spot - everytime... not just sometimes..
In that same decision I made the choice that I wanted to be over prepared vs under or marginally prepared.
I agree the 250 Thor from a ML will work if you use it within its limits. For me i would like to have a bigger margin of error, but that is just me.