Nikon or Bushnell
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have Bushnell DOA, Leupold Sabre,and Nikon Omegas. I much prefer the Nikon over the others. I really like the circles and I can taylor a load to the gun real easy by either centering the circle or using the bottom of the circle for holdover or using the top of the circle for a 6 oclock hold. I don't find the scope cluttered at all. Well worth the extra money for the Nikon over the Bushnell.
#12
Both the Bushnell and the Omega have better listed eye relief, but the Diamondback has a significant advantage in field of view, 44.6 - 14.8' @ 100yds versus 33 - 11' (Bushnell) and 25.2 - 8.4' (Nikon).
#13
Fork Horn
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 195
Omega45
"I have the Bushnell 3-9x40 Trophy DOA 250"
That's the one I was referring to, have not looked through one though. I almost bought one, but didn't. If I ever get a chance out west with my ML, I'll wish I had. I like a lot of eye relief, if you could, would you try to measure actual eye relief and report back?
I know published and actual can be different. Thanks.
"I have the Bushnell 3-9x40 Trophy DOA 250"
That's the one I was referring to, have not looked through one though. I almost bought one, but didn't. If I ever get a chance out west with my ML, I'll wish I had. I like a lot of eye relief, if you could, would you try to measure actual eye relief and report back?
I know published and actual can be different. Thanks.
#16
I have a friend who has the Nikon Omega and he loves it. I believe the Nikon has slightly better light-transmission than the Bushnell.
If I personally had to choose between the two and price was not a factor I would get the Nikon.
Go to a local sporting goods store and have the salesperson take you outside with both scopes and look thru them at DUSK.
If I personally had to choose between the two and price was not a factor I would get the Nikon.
Go to a local sporting goods store and have the salesperson take you outside with both scopes and look thru them at DUSK.