Scales - True or False?
#11
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,585
RE: Scales - True or False?
The type of powder and the type of measure as well as your methodology.
I like APP FF because I can use a volume mease and it keeps the same groups.With FFF I have to weigh with Black powder or Pryodex volume works well for me but with Gold or pinnicle I have to weigh. Lee
I like APP FF because I can use a volume mease and it keeps the same groups.With FFF I have to weigh with Black powder or Pryodex volume works well for me but with Gold or pinnicle I have to weigh. Lee
#12
RE: Scales - True or False?
Just browsing andfound this thread...had an interesting thought:
"I wonder how many peoplecould tellif someoneloaded their rifle behind their back and short charged their pet hunting load by 5 grains volume?"
"I wonder how many peoplecould tellif someoneloaded their rifle behind their back and short charged their pet hunting load by 5 grains volume?"
#13
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 714
RE: Scales - True or False?
ORIGINAL: roundball
Just browsing andfound this thread...had an interesting thought:
"I wonder how many peoplecould tellif someoneloaded their rifle behind their back and short charged their pet hunting load by 5 grains volume?"
Just browsing andfound this thread...had an interesting thought:
"I wonder how many peoplecould tellif someoneloaded their rifle behind their back and short charged their pet hunting load by 5 grains volume?"
#14
RE: Scales - True or False?
ORIGINAL: Wolfhound76
5 gr by volume may not seem like a lot but would probably result in a flyer.
ORIGINAL: roundball
Just browsing andfound this thread...had an interesting thought:
"I wonder how many peoplecould tellif someoneloaded their rifle behind their back and short charged their pet hunting load by 5 grains volume?"
Just browsing andfound this thread...had an interesting thought:
"I wonder how many peoplecould tellif someoneloaded their rifle behind their back and short charged their pet hunting load by 5 grains volume?"
#15
RE: Scales - True or False?
I personally think that if a person wants to measure their loads, what's the problem? If they want to do that and feel it produces better groups for them then by all means do it. For those that think it is not necessary, well no one is asking you to measure.
I think this calls for some field testing on my part. I will measure out ten charges and shoot a group with a roundball rifle. I will then clean the rifle and do the same with a volume charge measure and see if there is a difference. I personally think that when you keep each shot as close to the next by all indications your accuracy should improve.
Now to decide what rifle to use... May add one more extreme to this and use pellets, measured loose powder, and volume measure powder..
I think this calls for some field testing on my part. I will measure out ten charges and shoot a group with a roundball rifle. I will then clean the rifle and do the same with a volume charge measure and see if there is a difference. I personally think that when you keep each shot as close to the next by all indications your accuracy should improve.
Now to decide what rifle to use... May add one more extreme to this and use pellets, measured loose powder, and volume measure powder..
#16
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 714
RE: Scales - True or False?
5 gr of 777 is enough to tell. 777 has more in common with smokeless than it does with blackpowder. The difference between volume charges and weighed charges with it is very noticable. That difference increases the further the range. I've had loads measured out volumetrically that didn't meet my minimum accuracy requirements (2"@100 yds) that the same charge weighedto within 1/10th gr easily did. I've seen weighed charges 1/2 group size. When I weighed out 100 gr charges I found differences of 2-4 gr by weight. Some of my powdermeasures were more accurate than others.
I used to know a fellow over on the old CVA forum, underclocked will probably remember him, who weighed everything, bullets, primers, powder and sabots. He grouped them with no more than 1/10th gr differences. He routinely shot 1/2" groups and often 1/4". What always got me was he was so humble about it. I wonder whatever happened to him.
I used to know a fellow over on the old CVA forum, underclocked will probably remember him, who weighed everything, bullets, primers, powder and sabots. He grouped them with no more than 1/10th gr differences. He routinely shot 1/2" groups and often 1/4". What always got me was he was so humble about it. I wonder whatever happened to him.