Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-30-2005, 06:38 AM
  #1  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kerrville, Tx. USA
Posts: 2,722
Default APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

Anyone know what the difference is supposed to be? Anyone tried the Gold? TIA
txhunter58 is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 10:25 AM
  #2  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 161
Default RE: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

The gold is supposed to be 2nd screening (like thepyro. select) It is also supposed to bea little faster and have better moisture resistance over theregular stuff. This iswhat I've been told.
TC209x50 is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 11:49 AM
  #3  
Dominant Buck
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default RE: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

More expensive Usually when a powder is considered better, it is because it is screened to a more consistent granule size. This normally will produce a better product whether this Gold is, I do not know. I used to shoot a lot of Pyrodex Select instead of Pyrodex RS. Again, a better screened product. It never shot any better, fowled any less, and I decided it was not worth the couple buck morea pound I was paying for it at the time.

If you get some Shocky Gold powder and test it, be sure and post your results. Some of the information people are putting out on powder, and projectile testing is really interesting.
cayugad is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 01:28 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,236
Default RE: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

I think the extra cost is going directly in Jim Shockeys pocket.
That, and the fancy packaging.
livbucks is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 08:10 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
VAhuntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 3,116
Default RE: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

I don't know what the difference is but it shoots very good in my Omega! Bought some a few weeks ago and compared it to 777 and was very impressed.
VAhuntr is offline  
Old 12-30-2005, 09:03 PM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kerrville, Tx. USA
Posts: 2,722
Default RE: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

VA, I assume you mean you tried the Gold?
txhunter58 is offline  
Old 12-31-2005, 06:17 AM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
VAhuntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 3,116
Default RE: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???

txhunter, Yes I did try some Shockey's Gold out a few weeks ago. I compared 3f loose Shockey's Gold to 2f loose 777. The Shockeys powder shot very well and was quite a bit cleaner(not nearly as clean as the magazine advertisements though). I did not chronograph the loads but the Shockey's Gold printed close enough to the 777 that I could hunt with it with out making a major scope adjustment.

If anyone is considering APP or Sockey's Gold I would definately recommend getting it in 3f. The 3f Shockey's was more course than my 2f triple seven, so I can only imagine how course the 2f Shockey's would be.
VAhuntr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alsaqr
Black Powder
17
11-09-2006 11:24 AM
nysbowhunter
Black Powder
4
07-02-2006 10:55 AM
TC209x50
Black Powder
1
12-29-2005 08:00 AM
silver 77/50
Black Powder
7
11-08-2005 11:06 AM
yakfisher
Black Powder
0
10-26-2005 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: APP vs. Jim Shockey's Gold???


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.