Community
Black Powder Ask opinions of other hunters on new technology, gear, and the methods of blackpowder hunting.

Blackpowder Record Books

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-28-2005, 12:02 PM
  #11  
Fork Horn
Thread Starter
 
BGHUNTER00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 341
Default RE: Blackpowder Record Books

Trophy Hunter, I'm from Tippecanoe Co. near Lafayette. That is a very impressive Whitetail you have there.


BGHUNTER00 is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 06:10 PM
  #12  
 
roundball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 501
Default RE: Blackpowder Record Books

ORIGINAL: vangunsmith

Here you go! This is throught the National Muzzleloader Rifle Ass. Longhunter Muzzleloading Big Game Record Book,NMLRA> P.O. Box 67,Friendship,Ind.47021. They can give you all the info you might need and want. vangunsmith
Just to ensure clarification on this point, the NMLRA was originally founded by and for Traditional Muzzleloading enthusiasts in 1933.
The "Longhunter's Record Book" was established to record accomplishments by traditional minded "longhunters"...muzzleloading enthusiasts usingtraditional equipment commonly used back during the early American traditionalmuzzleloading era.

Unfortunately,the NMLRAhas begunallowing entries into the"Longhunters Record Book" of game taken withmodern, long range, high powerscoped rifles, using modern shotgun primers in sealedignition systems,usingmodern powder (indeed smokeless powder) as well asmodern bullets, etc.......allbecause these rifles happento load from the front...and all coincidently in synchwithlarge financial donations to the NMLRA from various modern inline manufacturers.

This significantlydilutes / taintsthe intent and purpose of the "Longhunters Record Book"...sort of like allowing F15 Strike Eagles to competein a WWII fighter plane air show.
roundball is offline  
Old 11-28-2005, 11:10 PM
  #13  
Dominant Buck
 
cayugad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 21,193
Default RE: Blackpowder Record Books

ORIGINAL: roundball

ORIGINAL: vangunsmith

Here you go! This is throught the National Muzzleloader Rifle Ass. Longhunter Muzzleloading Big Game Record Book,NMLRA> P.O. Box 67,Friendship,Ind.47021. They can give you all the info you might need and want. vangunsmith
Just to ensure clarification on this point, the NMLRA was originally founded by and for Traditional Muzzleloading enthusiasts in 1933.
The "Longhunter's Record Book" was established to record accomplishments by traditional minded "longhunters"...muzzleloading enthusiasts usingtraditional equipment commonly used back during the early American traditionalmuzzleloading era.

Unfortunately,the NMLRAhas begunallowing entries into the"Longhunters Record Book" of game taken withmodern, long range, high powerscoped rifles, using modern shotgun primers in sealedignition systems,usingmodern powder (indeed smokeless powder) as well asmodern bullets, etc.......allbecause these rifles happento load from the front...and all coincidently in synchwithlarge financial donations to the NMLRA from various modern inline manufacturers.

This significantlydilutes / taintsthe intent and purpose of the "Longhunters Record Book"...sort of like allowing F15 Strike Eagles to competein a WWII fighter plane air show.
Just to ensure clarification on a point, the NMLRS was originally founded by Traditional Muzzleloading enthusiasts in 1933 which of course we all know was long before modern inline rifles were even established or a large part of the muzzleloading scope of events as they are today.

The "Longhunter's Record Book" of course was established by traditional minded "longhunters" enthusiasts using traditional equipment because again, when the record book was established modern inline muzzleloaders were not part of the muzzleloading world..

I do agree with Roundball on one point. I do not feel that modern inline rifles should be included in the same record as a traditional rifle. I see no problem with having a seperate catagory for the modern inline rifle. Also the addition of a scope should put that into again a different catagory. I do not mean to take anything away from the accomplishments of anyone, only that there is a true difference in the manner in which the a record animal is taken when you talk traditional rifle, scoped in line, or unscoped inline.

Other then that I do not think anything as far as the record is tainted if a seperation was made.
cayugad is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
patgrizzlyhunter
Bowhunting
5
12-25-2008 10:29 PM
atlasman
Bowhunting
87
02-04-2008 11:55 AM
Wolf killer
Bowhunting
10
03-14-2004 10:03 AM
atlasman
Bowhunting
6
11-07-2003 08:02 AM
shed1
Bowhunting
26
02-01-2002 10:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Blackpowder Record Books


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.